News-Home

Pro-labor campaign pledges draw fire

SANTA ROSA: Council candidates sharply divided on issue

Published: Friday, October 10, 2008 at 5:00 a.m.
Last Modified: Friday, October 10, 2008 at 1:31 p.m.

When Marsha Vas Dupre served on Santa Rosa's City Council, she occasionally accused some council members of being beholden to those who helped get them elected -- developers and real estate interests who poured thousands of dollars into their campaigns.

Now her conduct and that of three other City Council candidates -- Michael Allen, Gary Wysocky and Judy Kennedy -- is being questioned by some of the other challengers in the November race.

All four signed pledges with the county's largest and most powerful employee union, Service International Employees Union 1021 -- promising to "publicly support and actively encourage" SEIU's organizing efforts and to encourage other employers to quickly reach labor agreements once workers vote to unionize.

It's a pledge most of the 15 candidates running for City Council said they refused to sign and contend oversteps the ethical boundaries of an elected official's duties.

"The pledge raises some ethical questions. How do you agree to that and serve on the city council," asked candidate Don Taylor, a restaurant owner.

Taylor said the union's demand to get the pledge in writing was even more surprising.

"There might have been a wink and a nod in previous elections, but putting it in writing? I found it shocking they expected you to sign a pledge of what you should do if they supported you," he said.

Vas Dupre, a retired middle school counselor who served on the council from 1998 to 2002, said she didn't see "anything onerous or heavy-handed" about the pledge.

"It's not a legally binding document. It's not like we'll be out there making Macy's a union shop. That is not our business as a city government," she said.

While she railed in past years about developer-influenced council members, she said the positive way to look at the union pledge "is it balances the playing field" between the business and labor factions that vie every two years to influence the makeup of the council.

But Vas Dupre said a true balance will be difficult to achieve. "There is no balance to the amount of money they (development- and business-supported candidates) are getting," she said.

Wysocky, a certified public accountant, said from his standpoint there is "no quid pro quo" for signing the pledge.

"I'm not telling the potential union member what to do. I want to actively encourage people to have a choice. It's a civil rights issue," he said.

Kennedy, a former health care worker and union member, signed the pledge because "the rights of workers is Santa Rosa's business."

Kennedy, who was upset by the question and accused the Press Democrat of conducting an anti-labor campaign in its news pages, said, "Voters will vote me in because they want the voice of the neighborhoods on the council. I don't think they give a rat's ass if I support labor's right to strike or not."

Allen himself once was the general manager for SEUI Local 707, which merged with other affiliates of the union last year to create a single entity, Local 1021. Today, Local 1021 represents 2,700 of county government's 4,200 workers.

Allen, a district director for state Sen. Pat Wiggins, also has publicly criticized the amount of developer and real estate money that has flowed to council members in past campaigns and argued it should be considered by voters at election time.

Allen sees no problem in signing the pledge.

"It doesn't mean you will do what the unions want you to do. It means you will be open-minded," he said.

"Ninety percent of the time what that means is you want to see a fair election process whether they vote it up or down," Allen said of the pledge.

But Santa Rosa police Lt. Ernesto Olivares, a council candidate and former president of the Santa Rosa Police Officers Association, said signing the pledge is improper.

"I don't think it's appropriate for anyone to ask a candidate to make promises to them. Seeking pledges and promises really crosses the line," he said.

Olivares, however, said there is one pledge he is willing to make. "That pledge is I will always sit down and listen."

Councilwoman and candidate Carol Dean, whose husband was a longtime but now retired union member of Santa Rosa's Fire Department, also objected to the blatancy of the request.

"Unionizing is between employee and employers. That is not why people would elect me to the city council, to go out and act as an (labor) organizer," she said.

Despite the signed pledges, only one of the four signatories has received any substantial labor campaign contributions to date.

Allen's labor support so far totals more than $12,000 given by 28 labor groups. That includes $500 from the local SEIU.

Kennedy, according to campaign filings, hasn't received any union donations while Wysocky has received only one, a $250 contribution from SEIU United Health Care Workers Political Action Committee.

Vas Dupre received a similar donation from the health care workers union along with almost $1,700 in contributions from five other labor groups.

The next update to report campaign contributions is Oct. 23.

You can reach Staff Writer Mike McCoy at 521-5276 or mike.mccoy@pressdemocrat.com.


Comments

Only moderator-approved comments are shown on this page. To see all comments, please visit the forum.
    Post a comment | View all comments on this topic.
  1. foodguy15 says...
    October 10, 2008 6:28:16 am

    RE: Link

    "It doesn't mean you will do what the unions want you to do. It means you will be open-minded," he said.

    BULL Dung....it means that THE UNION is more important than the PEOPLE. It means that you are to BACK the UNION over the PEOPLE.

    Remember the union??s slogan 'More for us. Less for you.

    Go to hell UNIONS. You are the PROBLEM??..

  2. Shymmer says...
    October 10, 2008 7:10:29 am

    Unions are Pro Labor, and Pro Labor means pro working/living wages, living wages benefit everyone. Especially working families. How can anyone not be happy with decent wages and affordable healthcare? In the meantime, those that support big business that pay their employees squat, have almost bankrupted this town. There are unfinished construction sites all over the place. Pro labor all the way!!

  3. foodguy15 says...
    October 10, 2008 7:17:39 am

    More UNION BS

    ACORN has developed very close ties to the labor movement becoming a sort of ??one-stop shop for unions looking to contract out labor activities,? ACORN??s efforts have thus far flown under the radar for Federal regulatory agencies that act as watchdogs and regulators over union activities.
    ACORN has, for instance, worked closely with the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW). Most notably ACORN served to train SEIU staffers in the anti-Wal-Mart efforts the SIEU launched in the last few years.
    Some of ACORN??s recent activities are as follows:
    ? SEIU paid ACORN founder and chief of anti-Wal-Mart strategies Wade Rathke $21,885 in salary and $5,233 in expenses for the role of ??campaign project organizer.?
    ? SEIU gave $50,000 contribution to ??Walmart Associations? in the care of Wade Rathke
    ? SEIU paid a $126,000 ??subsidy? to Wal-Mart Alliance for Reform Now, operated by ACORN
    ? Change to Win paid ACORN $30,000 for a ??public awareness campaign.?
    ? SEIU twice awarded ACORN a $40,000 ??monthly retainer.?
    ? SEIU paid more than $970,000 to ACORN??s ACLOC program for ??training.?
    ? SEIU Local 5 paid ACLOC $58,487 for an internship phase and for an ??organizing partnership.?
    ? UFCW hired ACLOC as a ??consultant for organizing program? at a cost of $429,431
    ? UFCW Local 876 paid $131,089 for a ??community standards program.?
    ACORN is also on record as providing direct staffing for various labor union efforts and programs as opposed to mere training and consultancy work, as well.
    This close relationship raises questions as to whether ACORN should fall under Federal regulations as a labor organization

  4. unionvoice says...
    October 10, 2008 7:59:50 am

    It is time for Santa Rosa to unseat the present cast of wilted, regressive council members...Jane Bender, John Sawyer and Carol Dean need to go. We all know what the word "Pledge" means to Carol Dean. She pledged not to run again and then immediately changed her mind, so I can assume that a pledge is really nothing set in concrete. What are you all worried about?The time has finally come to put a new spin on the city council...one that actually favors a living wage, fairness and integrity at the bargaining table and one that will ride the new wave of progressive politics. The "TEAM" is a joke...nobody takes them seriously and everyone knows that they do not have a clue about running city government. The union backed council candidates have a fabulous chance of sweeping the council for the first time and it scares the hell out of the "TEAM".

  5. cint says...
    October 10, 2008 8:30:31 am

    It is clearly unethical for any politician to sign pledges for any group, especially unions that manipulate the processes to favor their special interests. Unions are and have been a part of the problem in America. The California prison guard union is one snake-in-the-grass that is presently adversely affecting all state taxpayers attempting to manipulate state government. Unions are big business itself and well known to create more issues than they've ever resolved.

  6. lovesthelaw says...
    October 10, 2008 8:39:10 am

    Unions are liberal and liberalism has done nothing to make things better in this country.The always function under the same premise as the socialists that are pushing government control. It's always about more for the labor force, and all it results in is more dues, higher taxes, more mandates and regulations for business.

    Down with unions, and their fat cats! Liberalism at it's ugly worst!

Next Article in