61°
Partly sunny
SUN
 86°
 53°
MON
 90°
 58°
TUE
 82°
 56°
WED
 78°
 56°
THU
 79°
 53°

Vote for the Best of Sonoma County finalists: Best place to get married, best fundraising event and much more!

COHEN: Electoral College: End this anachronism

  • Joshua Jalin Musick napped on a desk while the Virginia Electoral College met in Richmond on Dec. 15, 2008. (Associated Press)

I've voted all my life in either Washington, D.C., or New York state. Most of that time, my vote didn't matter one bit and this year is no exception. New York, where I now live, is in the bag for Barack Obama. Even though it is called the Empire State, has 29 electoral votes and is the birth state of four presidents (and the home of others), it might as well be Podunk when it comes to the presidential race. Because of the Electoral College, New York isn't the Big Apple. It's nowhere.

New York is hardly alone in this (non) category. Most of the nation has watched the candidates return time and time again to a place called Ohio or to Florida, which is a resort, for crying out loud. These are two of the vaunted battleground states that will choose the next president for the rest of us. Speaking just for myself, I am not grateful.

What's true for New York is true also for California and most other states. Were it not for the need to do some fundraising, the candidates might spend the whole year in Ohio — Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan have been there a total of 14 times this month alone — or in Colorado. I have yet to see a single presidential spot on TV. Ohioans, in contrast, have been bombarded with zillions of them, almost certain years from now to prove deleterious to their health. Nevada is another swing state, and the lucky people of Las Vegas have weathered about 73,000 ads just since June. This cannot be good for growing children.

If we had a simple popular vote system, my vote would count the same as someone's in Ohio or Virginia. I would not be taken for granted and, even better, the winner of the popular vote would be the winner of the election. As things stand now, this is not always the case. In 2000, Al Gore got precisely 543,895 more votes than did George W. Bush, but (narrowly) lost in the Electoral College. Admittedly, this is a rare event, but the estimable political analyst Charlie Cook is now saying it could happen again. As long as the country remains more or less evenly split, the possibility of a popular vote win but an Electoral College loss remains all too real.

© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View