On April 20, 1999, when two heavily armed students started shooting at Columbine High School, an armed deputy was on duty. Deputy Neil Gardner exchanged fire with at least one of the gunmen, and other law enforcement officers quickly responded to his call for assistance.
Despite their efforts, 12 students and one faculty member died.
Gardner was assigned full-time to the Littleton, Colo. high school. In Santa Rosa, police officers are present for a while most days at middle schools and high schools. But there are nearly 100,000 public schools in the United States — as well as thousands of private schools where parents also expect and deserve safety for their children. The cost of full-time police protection would run into the billions, with no guarantee of an outcome any different from Columbine.
The National Rifle Association's proposal for armed guards in every school is a diversion. Arming teachers or principals, another idea pushed by gun advocates, sounds more like a movie script than a serious strategy for protecting schools. Neither idea deserves to be taken seriously.
Nor should hysterical claims that local, state or federal government officials are planning to take anyone's guns away. No one has suggested that — and there isn't any way to do so.
But it is time for an informed and measured national conversation about guns, safety and violence.
It may be impossible to prevent the next Newtown, the next Columbine, the next Fort Hood. But it may be possible to limit the carnage.
Here are some ideas worth pursuing: