74°
Sunny
WED
 77°
 54°
THU
 75°
 53°
FRI
 71°
 51°
SAT
 75°
 51°
SUN
 81°
 54°

Vote for the Best of Sonoma County SO SONOMA COUNTY finalists: Best nonprofit, volunteer and more!

PD Editorial: Senate ignores the public on gun vote

  • (NICK ANDERSON / Houston Chronicle)

The parents of Newtown lost again. So did the vast majority of Americans.

Four months ago, as the nation mourned 20 first-graders and the brave teachers who tried to shield them, the gun lobby's grip on Washington was shaken. But as the shameful votes Wednesday in the Senate demonstrated, it wasn't broken.

With semiautomatic efficiency, senators shot down expanded background checks, size limits for ammunition magazines and a ban on civilian ownership of military-style assault weapons.

Most surprising — and least defensible — was the rejection of universal background checks. This bipartisan compromise, carefully crafted by two senators who own firearms, would have extended a routine practice at retail outlets to gun shows, the Internet and other venues where people who can't acquire guns legally do their shopping. In recent polls, this plan was favored by a 9-1 margin.

How often do 90 percent of Americans agree on any political issue?

But that wasn't enough. Neither was a 54-vote majority, because nothing moves in the Senate without 60 votes — the number needed to break a filibuster — in this era of partisanship run amok.

The result: Supporters of a modest attempt to keep guns away from criminals and people judged to be mentally unstable were again outgunned by the National Rifle Association and its allies, among them Sen. Charles Grassley.

“Criminals don't submit to background checks now,” the Iowa Republican said. “They will not submit to expanded background checks.”

By that logic, what's the point of outlawing murder or bank robbery or anything else? Criminals ignore other laws, too.

An angry President Barack Obama, standing alongside the parents of some of Newtown's young victims, spoke for tens of millions of Americans who expected more of their elected leaders.

“Who are we here to represent?” Obama asked. “I've heard folks say that having families of victims lobby for this legislation was somehow misplaced. A prop somebody called them. Emotional blackmail some outlets said. Are they serious? Do we really think that thousands of families whose lives have been shattered by gun violence do not have a right to weigh in on this issue?”

© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View