We’ve seen this movie before. Sadly, there is no happy ending.
We have another racially charged incident that led to a racially charged criminal trial resulting in yet another controversial verdict that satisfies some but infuriates others. We have threats of violence, civil unrest and a divided America.
Tragically, at moments like these, what Americans don’t have much of is moral leadership — the kind that can teach people how to cope with anger and disappointment over what they perceive to be an unjust outcome without making matters worse.
It sounds as though George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin both made mistakes in their deadly confrontation on Feb. 26, 2012. Zimmerman shouldn’t have been carrying a gun, and itching to play wannabe cop by pursuing a stranger after a 911 dispatcher told him not to. Supporters of Zimmerman say Martin shouldn’t have been so aggressive, pummeling the neighborhood watch volunteer while he was on the ground and repeatedly slamming his head into the concrete.
Unfortunately, in the nearly 17 months since that night, many of the commentators haven’t conducted themselves much better. Just a few weeks after the shooting, President Obama made the provocative comment: “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon Martin.” The president seemed to taking sides, and improperly injecting himself into a local investigation before anyone had been charged with a crime.
All the more reason that Obama deserves praise for what he is saying now that Zimmerman has been acquitted of second-degree murder charges. Less than 24 hours after the verdict, the president issued a written statement in which he acknowledged that the case had “elicited strong passions” but also stressed that “we are a nation of laws, and a jury has spoken.” Obama has taken heat from some African-Americans for saying that.
But this is the right message. A jury reached a decision, and the verdict should be accepted whether we agree with it or not.