SYDNEY — Judging wine, something I have done for more than 30 years, can be challenging or it can be fun. Mostly it's the former, combined with doses of frustration, aggravation, and pain.
Rarely is it the latter.
And the reasons for it being a not-so-easy task are numerous, starting with the fact that wine judges do not usually go into this activity looking for a lot of enjoyment. The mindset, when facing 55 dark red wines and their expected high tannins, is more survival than pleasure.
The best wine competitions to judge, for me, are those that are regional, where the wines come from a pre-determined area and where the styles of wine are at least partially predictable.
So I particularly like regional competitions, such as the recent Mendocino County Fair wine competition, staged in Boonville. There are a limited number of wines, their styles are based on a set of known parameters, and the judges are all relatively familiar with the region and what it does best (and not so well).
Importantly, the judges are asked to judge a manageable number of wines per day (say 60 to 90), allowing for a sane discussion of the wines before medals are agreed upon.
By contrast it's less easy to do a major wine competition in which judges evaluate wines from a wide range of places and at which some panels are asked to judge about 200 wines in a day (or more!), and where categories are not even broken up into smaller groupings.
I'll never forget the time not long ago when I was asked to judge 17 Viogniers, 90 Petite Sirahs, and 95 Syrahs on the same day. It was no fun. (And certainly not beneficial to the wines.)
I experienced another fascinating judging over the last week here in Australia. I was the lone U.S. wine judge at the Six Nations Wine Challenge, a contest pitting the best wines of Argentina, Australia, Chile, New Zealand, South Africa, and the United States against one another in 17 different wine categories.