“If a free society can't help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.” — the inaugural address of John F. Kennedy, January 20, 1961.
For too long, community leaders looked the other way while Santa Rosa was becoming a city divided between those who have more and those who have less, between those who have access to local government and those who do not. Issues of income, ethnicity and class are never easy, and so the path of least resistance led to less difficult issues.
Last week, community leaders learned what happens in a city where tens of thousands of people feel ignored and disrespected.
After a 13-year-old Latino boy was shot and killed by a sheriff's deputy, there was no reservoir of trust and understanding to help the community navigate the confusion, grief and anger.
For many, the death of Andy Lopez becomes only the latest reminder that the city's leaders didn't want to listen to their concerns, or otherwise acknowledge the changes all around us.
People will continue to disagree about whether the shooting could have been avoided. The youngster was carrying a BB gun designed to look like an assault rifle, and investigators say the deputy mistook the BB gun for the real thing. These arguments will go on for a very long time.
But we can hope that the shooting and its aftermath become a moment in which Santa Rosa leaders move beyond the drift and inertia of recent years.
It's in nobody's best interest that there are two Santa Rosas — one east and one west, one enjoying the best of what California has to offer and the other struggling to survive.
Unfortunately, the first response from City Hall only made the week more dispiriting. City Council members said they couldn't speak to their city's grief and pain because the city manager and city attorney instructed them to keep quiet.
At a moment when leadership was critical, the city's elected representatives were silent. (One may ask, what's the purpose of an elected council if it is willing to cede its authority to others?)