Catering to protesters
EDITOR: The tragic death of Andy Lopez has been co-opted by self-interest groups with an obvious grudge against law enforcement officers. Sadly, The Press Democrat is playing along. It has failed in its obligation to impartially give us basic background facts in the case.
The shooting occurred during school hours in an area known for gangs. Was Andy carrying his gun home from school? Was he even attending school? One early report said, without explanation, he had changed schools. Was he a problem child? I'm not saying he was, but the questions should be answered. Is Andy's family in the U.S. legally? What kind of work do the parents do?
Your silence and your catering to the protest groups makes me wonder.
EDITOR: Not to demean or in any way minimize the motives of those who have proudly served or are serving in the military, but Veterans Day, aka Armistice Day, officially ended World War I, “the war to end all wars” and, to paraphrase President Woodrow Wilson, was meant to honor those who died in battle.
As to more contemporary conflicts, e.g. the first Gulf War, Iraq and Afghanistan, honoring our “courageous heroes” has become a trite, jaded, overused accolade. In these ill-advised, ill-conceived conflicts, only a small percentage of troops actually have seen combat. Serious wounds and deaths are no less tragic, but, as we hear regularly, many are not combat related.
Our bloated presence half a world away in lands where we are despised has resulted in many casualties among the vast number of support troops, i.e. electricians, plumbers, food preparers/servers, medical and supply personnel, computer geeks, etc. I'm certain cases of hang nails and foot fungus are far more prevalent than heroic combat wounds and deaths.
So, Veterans Day rightfully honors those who, as President Abraham Lincoln so solemnly intoned at Gettysburg, “gave the last full measure of devotion.” Let's not get carried away with courage and heroism. Only a relative few were/are worthy of such praise.