EDITOR: President Barack Obama announced “significant changes” in the way the government collects and manages personal data while leaving in place “other pillars of the nation’s intelligence programs” (“Obama sets limits on phone spying,” Jan. 18). Changes? A careful reading of the president’s actual directive merits review. I quote:
“Nothing in this directive shall be construed to prevent me from exercising my constitutional authority, including as commander in chief, chief executive and in the conduct of foreign affairs, as well as my statutory authority. Consistent with this principle, a recipient of this directive may at any time recommend to me, through the APNSA, a change to the policies and procedures contained in this directive.”
Lofty words, perhaps, but the pronouns say it all: the president will decide — what is collected, where it is stored, etc. — everything. Yes, he’s the president, but when anyone, has — or at least claims — that level of authority, with or without “constitutional provision,” we’ve stepped squarely onto a dangerous path.
I am far more concerned with the direction this takes than with any personal data the government may have collected. As history duly reports, a government with self-claimed authority and secret courts can do anything with that data. I am truly frightened. You should be, too.
EDITOR: The Press Democrat has written many articles informing people about the drought and need for conservation. The Sonoma County Water Agency has spent a huge amount of money on publicity about its 20-gallon challenge and the need for conservation. The Marin-Sonoma Water Saving Partnership is putting out a lot of feel-good suggestions for saving water, but it’s all low-hanging fruit. Thus far, little or nothing has been publicly mentioned about mandatory conservation for Water Agency customers, where much higher rates are billed in tiers for those using high and higher amounts of water.