Push to expand state's early kindergarten program

  • Spanish teacher Jennie Eubanks, left, teaches children in a transitional kindergarten class at McKinley Elementary School, in Petaluma, as their teacher Lacey Murnig, right, listens on Wednesday, January 8, 2014. (Christopher Chung/ The Press Democrat)

An unexpected windfall for California's education coffers has Senate Democrats pushing to dramatically expand the existing transitional kindergarten program to all 4-year-olds.

Currently, transitional kindergarten is available only to those children who turn 5 between Oct. 2 and Dec. 2. In 2014-15, the program is to expand to include those who turn 5 between Sept. 2 and Dec. 2.

That's not enough, according to Senate leader Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, who along with State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson and Assembly Speaker John Perez, D-Los Angeles, announced plans to phase in an expansion of the existing early-kindergarten program to all 4-year-olds.

The expansion would roll out over five years, beginning in 2015-16.

Currently, approximately 120,000 children statewide are eligible for transitional kindergarten because of their birth dates. The expanded program would allow an additional 350,000 access to essentially two years of kindergarten.

"We think the research is very clear that preschool and pre-kindergarten education is invaluable to student success," said Mark Hedlund, spokesman for Steinberg.

"This is not really a new program as it is an expansion to the existing program to go full bore," he said.

"Existing transitional kindergarten only serves about 25 percent of the kids who otherwise would be eligible," he said. "The idea is to fill those gaps and have it provided to all 4-year-olds."

While some local educators expressed enthusiasm for the new plan, others said the formula has had issues in its 18 months of existence.

"One of the biggest issues is that TK never made any sense from the start," said Petaluma Superintendent Steve Bolman. "You were really creating outliers -#8212; you were providing a 14th year of education to your oldest kids. This (new plan) makes more sense than that, but (where is the) the wherewithal to pay for it when we are not spending on K-12 adequately?"

comments powered by Disqus
© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View