Mostly sunny

Wednesday's Letters to the Editor

<b>Expanding preschool</b>

EDITOR: Petaluma school Superintendent Steve Bolman rightly recognizes that early learning is one of the most important foundations we can provide to prepare students for success ("An early start for all," Thursday).

He may be pleased to learn that state Senate Leader Darrell Steinberg's proposal to expand and improve transitional kindergarten to serve all 4-year-olds in California will also involve private preschool providers. This proposal would expand access to nearly 200,000 additional 4-year-olds, and we will need the expertise and experience of current preschool providers to ensure that these young learners get what they need to thrive in the classroom.

But we also need to value those who teach these children. The best learning environments for children are created by well-educated teachers who are trained in early childhood development. Teaching preschool is no less complicated or important than teaching kindergarten and the grades beyond, and teachers' training and expertise should reflect that.

We at Early Edge California look forward to working with Bolman and school districts around the state to improve California's early learning system so that it serves more children with better programs and ensures all children are ready for success in school.


President, Early Edge California

<b>Courthouse dress code</b>

EDITOR: We the people are still wondering exactly what the dress policy is at the Sonoma County courthouse. The judges recently rescinded an order, which they said was requested by the sheriff, drafted in part by Judge Gary Medvigy and signed by then-Presiding Judge Rene Chouteau, that was clearly unconstitutional on its face. So the question remains, is there any properly noticed constitutionally firm dress code order currently in place at the courthouse? If so, what is it? And when and where was it properly noticed or posted?

With the election of five appointed judges coming up on June 3, just where do each of these judges sit on this important First Amendment issue? And which other judges served on the committee that approved the now rescinded order in the first place? We, the people, demand to know the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth from our judges who sit for election every six years.

comments powered by Disqus
© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View