Fired Petaluma police veteran, city head to arbitration

  • Dave Sears (COURTESY PHOTO)

A former Petaluma police lieutenant who is challenging his termination has agreed to binding arbitration with the city that may forestall a lengthy, contentious -#8212; and potentially public -#8212; legal battle.

Dave Sears, one of the department's highest-ranking officers since 1999, was fired in August after he said an internal complaint accused him of dishonesty. He said the complaint didn't allege inappropriate behavior, theft or improper conduct with any members of the public or the department. He maintains his dismissal is unwarranted.

The agreement to go to arbitration likely will become public once it is formalized, which should be soon, said Sears' attorney, Chris Miller of Mastagni Holstedt Amick Miller - Johnsen of Sacramento.

The sides agreed to the process in lieu of an appeal before the city's personnel board, which Sears had a right to demand.

Petaluma's city charter provides for a three-member personnel board, appointed by the City Council, to hear certain employees' disciplinary challenges. But as Sears continued to appeal his case, city officials realized the board has been inactive for more than a decade. The last appointment made to the board occurred in 2001, according to city records.

City Manager John Brown wouldn't speak directly about the Sears case, but acknowledged that some employees have procedural rights to seek review before the personnel board as part of their union contracts. He said most of the contracts have been rewritten over the years to eliminate the provision.

"It never functioned except as the hearer of an appeal," he said. "Somewhere along the line, the city just let that go."

If Sears pressed his right, a board would have to be in place and ready to hear an appeal within 30 days.

The city opened an application process for the board, but no one has applied, Brown said. With the Sears arbitration agreement nearing formalization, reconstituting the board isn't necessary, Brown said.

Neither side would discuss a time frame for the arbitration process. Both parties agreed it would be held in secret, Miller said.

comments powered by Disqus
© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View