We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, nearly 1.5 million people used their mobile devices to visit our sites.
Already a subscriber?
Wow! You read a lot!
Reading enhances confidence, empathy, decision-making, and overall life satisfaction. Keep it up! Subscribe.
Already a subscriber?
Oops, you're out of free articles.
Until next month, you can always look over someone's shoulder at the coffee shop.
Already a subscriber?
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, we posted 390 stories about the fire. And they were shared nearly 137,000 times.
Already a subscriber?
Supporting the community that supports us.
Obviously you value quality local journalism. Thank you.
Already a subscriber?
Oops, you're out of free articles.
We miss you already! (Subscriptions start at just 99 cents.)
Already a subscriber?

Officials with the state Department of Fish and Wildlife are recommending the move as part of a package of emergency regulations to help lessen the threat to fish already struggling to survive and spawn in extremely low-flow conditions around Northern and Central California.

The appointed five-member commission, which meets in Sacramento, can approve, ignore or alter the proposal.

"We can't make it rain," but reducing the pressure of continued fishing may encourage survival against the odds, department spokeswoman Jordan Traverso said.

She said the measure was aimed especially at protecting adult fish attempting to move upriver to spawn.

The proposal has drawn mixed reaction from anglers, though they generally support it. Some say the critically dry conditions and confined fish have given them more than enough reasons to pull their lines.

Others say the complete ban unnecessarily restricts those going after hatchery-raised steelhead, which are raised to provide a sport fishery.

"On one hand, it would do the fish a lot of good to have no pressure on them, especially in the low water situation," said Bruce MacDonell, president of the roughly 80-member Russian River Wild Steelhead Society, whose mission includes enhancement of the river ecosystem. "On the other hand, our system has two hatcheries built on it, as you know, as mitigation, and they make fish for sport fishing. So where do you draw the line?"

Record low rainfall and an effort to retain storage in regional reservoirs has cut flows in the Russian River and area tributaries so significantly that protected chinook and coho salmon and wild steelhead have been largely unable to reach their spawning grounds this year.

Where normally they would enter the river in November or December and move quickly upstream, many have remained in the lower reaches of the river waiting for nature to trigger further migration.

Mariska Obedzinski, a biologist with the UC Cooperative Extension coho salmon monitoring project, said a tagged 2-year-old coho recorded in the lower river Nov. 11 was picked up again a few days ago only a short distance upstream.

"So over two months it's been waiting," she said.

In addition to creating a logistical impediment to reproduction, the delay also means that salmon -#8212; which spawn in the last part of their life cycle -#8212; are growing more vulnerable each day, Obedzinski said.

As they wait in streams, natural predators, like seals and raptors, can pick them off.

"The more stress, the higher the chance that they're not going to survive long enough to make it up to their tributaries, if they do eventually open," Obedzinski said.

Rumors of the Russian River closure had already begun circulating before the wildlife agency announced its recommendations Wednesday, along with closures of several Northern California rivers, including large stretches of the Eel River.

Overall, the proposal appears to have widespread support among longtime anglers who have observed sufficiently dire conditions that it has dampened their interest in taking advantage of easy pickings.

"It's like fish in a barrel," said Guerneville general contractor Tom Niclaes. "I haven't fished in a week and a half just because I just don't feel right about it. It's not like 'I'm going fishing.' I'm going catching."

Several area fishermen described scenes of fish holed up by the dozens in pools along the lower part of river, attracting crowds of anglers.

They said most fishermen are educated and conscientious about using barbless hooks and targeting only the hatchery steelhead they're permitted to take. But the occasional capture of a protected chinook or maybe even an endangered coho salmon is always a possibility, creating stress for the fish even if they're caught and released.

"Most fishermen understand that you need to give the wild fish a chance here, and this low flow isn't getting them where they need to go," said Steve Jackson, owner of King's Sport - Tackle in Guerneville. "I personally feel it probably needs a low-flow closure even though it affects my business."

But he also voiced disappointment that the proposed closure does not appear to include provisions that would permit the fishery to be reopened if significant rainfall should arrive.

But for the most part, those interviewed Thursday said they can live with the three-month ban if it means the fishery will be healthier for it.

"There's only so much deep water, and the fish hole up there, and then people just pound them," said Kent MacIntosh, a fishing guide out of Healdsburg and field organizer for Trout Unlimited. "And it's too much pressure on them."

"Look at how much destruction we've done in 200 years, and that's not even the blink of an eye in the development of the earth," said Niclaes, the Guerneville contractor. "C'mon, give 'em a break and let's make sure that there's something left for somebody else."