59°
Clear
WED
 87°
 54°
THU
 83°
 55°
FRI
 82°
 54°
SAT
 86°
 55°
SUN
 83°
 55°

State Sen. Noreen Evans proposes labeling GMO foods in state (w/video)

  • Peter Breyfogle feeds his daughter, Katherine, 1, an organic package of pureed fruit and grains as Abraham Schroeder, left, feeds his son, Nathaniel, 8-months, a jar of organic pureed peas during lunch at Five Guys on Wednesday, February 19, 2014 in Petaluma, California. (BETH SCHLANKER/ The Press Democrat)

Evans originally was planning to target only baby foods. But later Thursday, her staff announced that her bill has been broadened to require GMO labeling for all foods used for "human consumption" in California. That more closely mirrors Proposition 37, which voters rejected in 2012. The senator's staff said about 85 percent of all foods on store shelves in California contain genetically modified organisms.

Evans did not respond to a request seeking comment on the changes made to the proposed legislation. Teala Schaff, her spokeswoman, said the changes were made at the request of the California State Grange, which pushed for the original bill.

"It's still a consumer-choice bill. She's always been a strong consumer-choice advocate," Schaff said.

Mike Greene, director of legislative affairs for the California State Grange, on Thursday attributed the last-minute changes to a "lack of communication between us and the senator's office."

The grange has about 10,000 members in about 45 California counties. Greene said the organization passed a resolution at its annual meeting in October calling for GMO labeling on baby foods. He said in November, a coalition of 17 groups, including the Grange, Pesticide Action Network and Organic Consumers Association, amended that stance to call for such labeling on all foods sold for human consumption in California.

He said the group had four meetings with the senator's staff but that "they didn't understand we were no longer talking about baby foods. We were talking about all foods."

That raises the stakes on the proposed legislation considerably. Anti-GMO advocates have been pushing for such labels for years, even though the federal government and many scientists say the biotechnology behind genetically modified organisms is safe.

Most grocers are opposed, on the grounds that such labels are unnecessary, confusing to consumers and likely to increase costs to produce new labels or ingredients to meet California's new restrictions.

"Every credible U.S. and international food safety authority that has studied GMO crops has found that they are safe and that there are no health effects associated with their use," said Brian Kennedy, a spokesman for the Grocery Manufacturers Association.

He said the nation's food safety and labeling laws "should not be set by political campaigns, or state and local legislatures."


comments powered by Disqus
© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View