Is a salary increase for elected officials ever popular?
So it's not at all surprising — nor particularly courageous — that legislators and other elected officials have created a variety of mechanisms to spare themselves from the politically delicate task of voting to raise their own pay.
For members of the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors, the solution was pegging their salaries to those of Superior Court judges. The supervisors fixed their pay at 75 percent of a trial court judge's base salary.
On Jan. 1, the judges got a 1.4 percent raise to $181, 292 a year, as approved by the Legislature.
The judges' increase triggered an identical 1.4 percent raise for Sonoma County supervisors, boosting their base salary to $135,969 a year, about twice the county's median household income.
Other cash compensation adds $15,000 or more to their gross pay, with health insurance and retirement benefits pushing their total compensation to more than $200,000 annually.
We recognize that the supervisors have a demanding, full-time job. Their portfolio includes law enforcement, health care, water delivery, public assistance and land-use issues in a county with 490,000 residents. They spend $1.3 billion a year and employ about 4,000 people.
Supervisorial salaries in Sonoma County are third among the nine Bay Area counties and solidly in the upper tier statewide. Yet they aren't way out of line considering their responsibilities, and the combined cost of this year's raise for all five supervisors is less than $10,000.
But the approach to setting those salaries is arbitrary, and it leaves the taxpayers without a voice.