62°
Cloudy
FRI
 74°
 59°
SAT
 67°
 48°
SUN
 71°
 43°
MON
 74°
 45°
TUE
 75°
 50°

Thursday's Letters to the Editor

Water wars?

EDITOR: Your article about California's pact with Israel ("Netanyahu, Brown sign pro-business pact," March 6) contained some serious irony. Gov. Jerry Brown and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were quoted extolling Israel's approach to water management, suggesting it could be a model for California. Netanyahu was quoted as saying "Israel has no water problems." Is this his tacit acknowledgment that the West Bank, Gaza and the Golan Heights are not part of Israel even though they're occupied by it? It would appear so, because Palestinians, who make up the vast majority of people living in those areas, are subject to extreme water deprivation and water pollution due to Israeli government policies.

If California were actually to pursue the Israeli model of water management, it would behoove Oregon and Nevada to prepare to defend their borders. Arizona and Mexico, not having any water left to steal, would not have to worry.

WESLEY SILVERTHORNE

Santa Rosa

Keeping promises

EDITOR: It seems David E. Gurley ("Fixing pension problem," Letters, Monday) that feels the "pension problem" can be fixed by "renegotiating those promises." What, exactly, is a promise? For hundreds of employees under contract, these promises are a contract, a legal binding contract that cannot be renegotiated at the discretion and convenience of management.

What if title to your home were renegotiated after paying your mortgage for 30 years? It would be convenient for your lender to renegotiate you into continue paying, despite your terms of your contract. It's the same thing with your car loan; what if it were renegotiated for you to continue paying after your loan was paid off? Or your widow, seeking payment from your life insurance policy? Certainly renegotiating that promise would help out the life insurance company, quite a bit. Your family would suffer, but hey, I'm sure that shareholders would support it.

Why is it OK to break a contract with labor, to renegotiate a promise made? Because it's financially convenient? Because labor doesn't matter? A contract is a contract, not a suggestion to be renegotiated whenever conflicting budget priorities occur.

Labor matters, and so do contracts. That's what a promise is — a commitment that you keep.


comments powered by Disqus
© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View