PD Editorial: No on A: Bodega needs a better plan

  • Firefighters douse remaining hotspots in a Bodega Bay home destroyed by a fire Monday morning, June 28th 2010. The fire also moved to an adjoining home on the Bodega Bay golf course in the South Harbour community.

For a fire department, there's no more basic duty than ensuring public safety. That makes it difficult to oppose Measure A, the Bodega Bay Fire Protection District's parcel tax measure on a special April 8 ballot.

The Sonoma Coast fire department's resources don't match its responsibilities. It has tapped into budget reserves, and without a tax increase, district officials warn that layoffs are on the horizon.

"The idea of picking up the phone and saying, 'Send help' — the prospect of that help being right there is going to be questionable," fire district board member Charlie Bone told Staff Writer Mary Callahan.

A cash injection might get the district through its immediate crisis, but there's no guarantee beyond that. And it won't begin to address the fundamental challenges facing Bodega Bay and other rural fire departments in Sonoma County.

The ranks of volunteers have been shrinking for years, with a half-dozen county districts unable to meet a 15-minute emergency response time standard in 2012. But converting to full-time firefighters is prohibitively expensive, and families struggling to recover from a deep recession are wary — and weary — of pleas for more taxes.

It's time for a new fire protection model.

Indeed, some of Sonoma County's 34 volunteer fire companies and independent fire districts already are merging or consolidating management operations. Meanwhile, county supervisors say they want to look at how fire services are delivered.

Unfortunately, nothing will be determined before Bodega Bay voters cast their ballots on Measure A.

Supporters say approving the $200-a-year tax increase would buy time for the district to pursue additional funding from state and county sources.

That would be a stronger argument if Measure A was temporary, but it's a permanent tax increase. Moreover, it's unlikely that the current board members will be any more successful than their predecessors in securing any large infusion of outside money.

comments powered by Disqus
© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View