52°
Cloudy
THU
 58°
 52°
FRI
 58°
 46°
SAT
 56°
 48°
SUN
 64°
 49°
MON
 65°
 45°

May 8 Letters to the Editor

<b>New light on Benghazi</b>

EDITOR: On April 29, Judicial Watch made public 41 new Benghazi-related State Department documents, secured under court order because the Obama administration had withheld them when responding to a congressional committee subpoena.

Among these documents was a newly declassified email showing then-White House Deputy Strategic Communications Adviser Ben Rhodes and other public relations officials attempting to orchestrate a campaign to "reinforce" President Barack Obama's image and to portray the Benghazi consulate terrorist attack as being "rooted in an Internet video, and not a failure of policy" — this coming just weeks before the November election and after Obama had declared al-Qaida on the run.

The argument over Benghazi has been going on for a long time. With these documents and a select congressional committee's work, following up on this new material, we now hope to get the full truth of what happened and where accountabilities should reside. Resolving this issue (before moving on) is the best way to honor the four Americans whose lives were taken in Benghazi. Surely most Americans would want that.

I hope The Press Democrat will keep its readers fully informed in this matter as the congressional probe progresses.

DAVE KILMER

Sonoma

<b>Rush to judgment</b>

EDITOR: I hope your editorial board carefully read the Close to Home column by Catherine Bartolomei and Anysia Fritz ("Putting the trials of Efren Carrillo in perspective," Sunday). It would have been good if it had been read prior to your editorial ("Efren Carrillo should step down," April 29).

It was disturbing to me that The Press Democrat was so ready to judge and condemn without any perspective on his professional, legislative record. No one could deny that what Carrillo did was grievously wrong. It was a personal failure he fully admitted on the witness stand before a jury of his peers and the entire public. He went through the democratic process as he should have, and now he is being excoriated because the jury didn't perform the way you and some members of the public thought it should.


comments powered by Disqus
© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View