s
s
Sections
You've read 3 of 10 free articles this month.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read 6 of 10 free articles this month.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read all of your free articles this month.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
We've got a special deal for readers like you.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting 99 cents per month and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?
Thanks for reading! Why not subscribe?
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting 99 cents per month and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?
Want to keep reading? Subscribe today!
Ooops! You're out of free articles. Starting at just 99 cents per month, you can keep reading all of our products and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?

Like a terminally ill patient preparing for the inevitable, Santa Rosa's redevelopment agency finished getting its affairs in order Monday.

The governing board of the 54-year-old agency, responsible for everything from fighting blight to funding downtown bicycle races, held what was almost certain its final meeting before its Feb. 1 dissolution.

"I think it's a real sad day for this community and other communities up and down the state of California," said board member Steve Burke, the city's former director of redevelopment and housing.

The final meeting of an agency whose operations were not well understood by the general public was, not surprisingly, sparsely attended. Board members were joined by a handful of staffers, one member of the media and a single member of the public, an affordable housing advocate named Gregory Fearon, who did not speak.

Danielle O'Leary, the city's economic development director, said she was disappointed not to see any signs of support from the public.

"Given the magnitude of how those programs touch people, it was kind of hard not to see any champions in the audience," O'Leary said.

The fact that the public doesn't appear to be mourning the loss of local redevelopment shows they are largely unaware of its accomplishments, said Frank Kasimov, city redevelopment specialist.

"I think it's probably indicative that people really don't know all the things that redevelopment does for a community, for the local economy, for jobs and affordable housing," Kasimov said.

Advocates of the state's 400 active redevelopment agencies say the tax revenue they generate and bonds they sell give local communities a vital tool to clean up blighted areas, create jobs and build affordable housing. Critics have labeled them as wasteful, lacking transparency and a threat to private property rights.

Gov. Jerry Brown estimates that if redevelopment agencies disappeared, local property taxes they feed on could flow instead to schools and other agencies, saving the state about $1 billion in education payments this year.

It is hard to explain the myriad consequences of the loss of redevelopment, but eventually it will become clear, Burke said.

"I think it's really something that people won't know or won't miss until it's gone," he said.

Without redevelopment, downtown Santa Rosa couldn't have been rebuilt as it was after the 1969 earthquake, Burke said. Without redevelopment a group of vacant, contaminated parcels along Santa Rosa Creek in Railroad Square couldn't have been cleaned up to one day become the Hyatt Vineyard Creek Hotel and Spa, he said.

The land that hotel now sits on is now one of the agency's key assets. The other is the former AT&T building downtown, which is under contract to be sold to developer Hugh Futrell by the end of June.

Transferring those two pieces of real estate to the city was one of the housecleaning items the agency needed to do in its final meeting.

In a related move, the agency also formalized a change to an easement allowing future residents of the Museum on the Square project to access the former AT&T building through the city's transit mall.

These actions were aimed at clarifying existing agreements before Feb.1, when the city will become responsible for fulfilling the agency's $10 million in required payments through June. An "oversight board" and the state will be looking over its shoulder.

Largest North Coast Wildfires

2017-Tubbs fire- approximately 36,432 acres in Sonoma and Napa Counties. 92% contained as of Oct. 19.


2017-Nuns Fire- approximately 54 thousand acres- 34,398 in Sonoma County and 20,025 in Napa county. 80% contained as of Oct. 19.


2017-Atlas Fire- approximately 51,624 acres in Napa and Sonoma Counties. 85% contained as of Oct. 19.


2017-Redwood Fire- approximately 36,523 acres in Mendocino County. 85% contained as of Oct. 19.


2017-Pocket Fire-approximately 14,225 acres in Sonoma County. 63% contained as of Oct. 19.


2017-Sulphur Fire-approximately 2,207 acres in Lake County. 96% contained as of Oct. 19.


(TOTAL North Bay fires as of Oct. 18.- 195,434 acres)

2015- Valley Fire burnt 76,067 acres in Lake County. A total of 1,955 structures were destroyed.

2012- North Pass Fire- approximately 41,983 acres in Mendocino County.

2004- Rumsey fire- 39,138 acres in Napa and Yolo counties.

1996- Fork fire, the largest fire on record, burned through approximately 83,057 acres in Lake County. Much of the devastation was focused in the Mendocino National Forest.

1981- Atlas Peak Fire- approximately 23 thousand acres in Napa County.

1981- Cow Mountain Fire- approximately 25,534 acres in Lake and Mendocino counties.

1964- Hanly Fire- approximately 52,700 acres in Sonoma and Napa Counties. 84 homes, 24 summer cabins and countless farm buildings destroyed including the historic Tubbs Mansion.

1964- Nunns Canyon- approximately 7,000 acres in Sonoma County.

-Source: CAL Fire

Board member Helga Lemke asked what's to stop the oversight board from selling that real estate to raise money.

Kasimov noted the AT&T building is in escrow, so that deal would have to be honored.

But Assistant City Attorney Mike Casey said there is so much uncertainty about the future that it was hard to say anything definitive.

"There direct answer to your question is we're not really sure," Casey said.

You can reach Staff Writer Kevin McCallum at 521-5207 or kevin.mccallum@pressdemocrat.com.