The restoration of an abandoned Navy communications station on Skaggs Island into marshlands could begin next year after being held up by a long impasse between two federal agencies.
Skaggs Island, a network of wetlands and hay pastures at the southern end of Sonoma County on San Pablo Bay, includes a Navy communications base that closed in 1993.
Historically, the 4,400-acre island was part of one of the most extensive wetlands networks on the Pacific Coast, serving as a fish hatchery for salmon, a rest stop for migrating shorebirds and home to a variety of other wildlife. But to create farmland, the island was drained, diked and converted to hayfields, displacing wildlife.
Now it is eyed as the core of a massive San Pablo Bay wetlands restoration effort supported by local, state and federal agencies as well as private conservation groups. The program aims to reclaim half of the 55,000 acres of former tidal marsh.
"Skaggs Island is dead center in the heart of the Sonoma Creek and Napa River watersheds and is the keystone piece of the wetlands restoration," said Marc Holmes, a bay lands restoration manager with the Novato-based Bay Institute who has been working to restore Skaggs Island since before the Navy station closed. "To not secure it would be disastrous for the restoration effort."
County Supervisor Tim Smith, who has lobbied for the project for years, is hopeful the island will be restored.
"If we are aggressive, this could be the largest wetlands restoration project west of the Mississippi River," Smith said. "Skaggs Island will be a real positive step toward restoring thousands of acres of Bay Area wetlands."
The Navy owns 3,300 acres of Skaggs Island, although it heavily used only 65 acres. The remaining 1,100 acres of the island are a privately owned hay farm, which preservationists also hope to acquire and eventually restore.
The state has designated $8 million to demolish Navy buildings on the site, including homes, a bowling alley and a movie theater.
The proposed restoration of the Navy property has broad support, but the sticking point has been who would be responsible for any contamination discovered on the site. So far, studies have found no significant contamination and the site is expected to be clean, state and federal officials said.