s
s
Sections
Sections
Subscribe
You've read 5 of 15 free articles this month.
Support local journalism and get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app, all starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read 10 of 15 free articles this month.
Support local journalism and get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app, all starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read all of your free articles this month.
Support local journalism and get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app, all starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
We've got a special deal for readers like you.
Support local journalism and get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app, all starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
Thanks for reading! Why not subscribe?
Support local journalism and get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app, all starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
Want to keep reading? Subscribe today!
Ooops! You're out of free articles. Starting at just 99 cents per month, you can keep reading all of our products and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?

The first, glowing reviews of David Michaelis's biography of cartoonist Charles Schulz are in. And suddenly the well-publicized "bombshell" that he had a fling with a younger woman at the end of his first marriage doesn't seem so important. Nor, for that matter, does the outspoken disappointment of Schulz's children in Michaelis's portrayal of their father.

It would seem, after reading what reviewers say in Friday's New York Times and Wall Street Journal and today's New York Times Book Review, that Sparky Schulz, Sonoma County's favorite son, belongs not to us, but to the ages. And the disapproval of friends and family, who would have preferred less analysis and more about his generosity, his humor, his kindness, doesn't really matter to the rest of the comic-loving, biography-reading world.

It's clear that Michaelis's 655-page "Schulz and Peanuts," which will be released for sale Tuesday, is not a book about a hometown hero. It's the life story of a national icon.

Schulz's widow, Jeannie Schulz, knows this. And she wasn't surprised, she said, by the positive reviews. But she feels that "it could have been an even greater book" if the negative aspects of his life had been more balanced.

Jeannie, who married Sparky in 1973, talked about the book Friday in the Warm Puppy, where she first met Schulz. "The man I knew loved to laugh and exercised his creativity in all sort of ways," she said. "He had a great curiosity and interest in things."

That man, she said, isn't in the book "and that was part of the magic of his genius."

"Almost schizophrenic" is the term Jeannie chooses to describe Michaelis's work. "There are wonderful, lyrical parts where David talks about Sparky, about how he draws the strip and how his genius comes out, which is what everybody wants to get at," she said.

"In the end, of course, creativity is a mystery. But there are other parts where David seems heavy-handed and makes judgments he has no basis to make," she said.

Michaelis, in a telephone conversation Friday, said: "Balance is not a goal for the biographer. Biography is an imperfect implement for personal remembrance. I wanted to present three things: Schulz the man, Schulz the artist and Schulz the creator of 'Peanuts.' Writing it for the family would have been a great disservice to Charles Schulz.

"I am looking forward to the memoir, to the next Schulz book. There is way too much in the life of this man for one biographer."

SOME of Schulz's friends who were interviewed by Michaelis (and full disclosure demands that I tell you I am one of them) expressed surprise last week when a New York Times story revealed the family's anger at a portrayal of Schulz as a bitter man, a cold and distant father who had an affair in 1970, when his first marriage was falling apart.

Cliff Silva, the 75-year-old groundskeeper at the ice arena, started working for the family 40 years ago when Sparky and his first wife, Joyce, and their five children were living at Coffee Grounds in Sebastopol. "I probably know more than the book," Silva said, laughing. But he admits that the news of Schulz's extramarital affair surprised him. "I would have thought it would have been the other way around," he said, "women chasing Sparky instead of Sparky chasing women. God, with all he had going for him, you'd think he wouldn't be able to hang the phone up."

"I miss Sparky," said Silva, "We talked every Tuesday. I never bugged him and he was good to me." Silva played on the Red Barons, Sparky's broom ball team at the ice arena, and remembers that on a trip to Oakland to see the Seals play hockey he first saw another side to Schulz, who had declined to sign autographs. "If he didn't want to talk to anybody, he didn't talk to them. "I thought 'Oh oh!' I guess you'd say he could be moody."

Sparky's friend and fellow ice hockey player, Raul Diez, saw a side of him that could be very sharp, but Raul could understand why. "I was never comfortable watching people come at him." he said. "It's unbelievable how aggressive people can be."

"Certainly he liked girls," said Raul's wife, Nancy. "He and Raul would sit in the Warm Puppy and watch them go by. But he was uncomfortable around women. Or so it seemed."

Chuck Bartley, one of Sparky's closest friends, agrees. "I never thought he'd have an affair because when he got close to a woman, he'd have a panic attack."

Bartley recalls his friend's wit. "He always had a quick reply and 90 percent of the time it would be very funny. I loved to hear him laugh. He had the greatest laugh. I wish he had been happier. He didn't laugh enough."

Bartley, the only one I spoke to besides Jeannie who has read the book, said: "Having known him as well as I did, I knew that he was sensitive and often depressed. But I never knew the background for his depression. I wish I had known all those things. I could have been more sympathetic. We never understood, Betty and I (Bartley's late wife, was also interviewed extensively for the book) why he was so unhappy."

Bartley said he was "very surprised that Sparky's kids would speak out.

"Naturally, its hard for them. Kids can be surprised by their father's lives. . . . He was a workaholic, so he probably wasn't the world's greatest father."

Dean James, former Oakmont golf pro and a Schulz friend, is a docent at the Schulz Museum. He also was surprised at the story. "I knew him well. I knew he would flirt, but that was it. I'm not surprised that the kids were

offended.

"I know he could get people upset," said James, "but he was generous and a genuine person, a true Minnesotan."

FINALLY comes the ultimate question: How would Sparky have liked this Michaelis portrayal of his life?

Jeannie agrees, albeit reluctantly, that he might have liked some parts of it. "He liked to read biographies," she said. "I think he liked to see how creative people lived their lives. There was almost always something -- tragedy, unrequited love."

Parts of Michaelis's book missed the boat, Jeannie insists. There's nothing about his humor, his fun with his kids, about how he helped people.

"But, yes, he would like to read about melancholy. He loved to read about Beethoven. I think he was trying to find out why he felt the way he did.

"So, yes, maybe that portion of the book, he would have liked."