EDITOR: With one killing incident after another, I think it's time to take a close look at the demented people who do this stuff. Do we need protection from guns or insane people? Disarm this country? I don't think so. I don't want to be at the wrong end of one of these incidents with a slingshot.
The Second Amendment is about us protecting our country from a tyrannical government. Let's see, the Department of Homeland Security decides to raid a house in Petaluma. It shows up with a tank, several dozen amateur cops, grenades, automatic weapons and dogs. And we are supposed to try and stop them with a .22 bolt action? They also have drones, night vision equipment, helicopters, machine guns and 450 million rounds of hollow-point ammo. Who doesn't stand a chance here?
EDITOR: Your editorial regarding guns, safety and violence ("Reasonable steps to limit gunfire deaths," Dec. 29) was dead center. You should repeat it once a week until real action is taken.
The gun lobby is so intent on cashing in on shooting tragedies. They reap huge profits from the sales of guns and ammunition. They only want answers that sell more guns and ammo — and expand the chances for tragedy.
I'd have been impressed if the gun lobby had responded to the Littleton, Colo. or Newtown, Conn. massacres with compensation to the families of the victims. No way, of course. They just point at the killers: "All their fault." The hard truth is that the killers didn't use marshmallows or toothpicks.
I hope Adam Lanza's mom had a few seconds to regret how foolish she was to give him access to an arsenal — even knowing only the tip of the tragedy.