Mostly clear

Rohnert Park planners approve EIR for Wal-Mart

  • Suzanne Cossette speaks in support of the expansion of the Walmart in Rohnert Park during the Rohnert Park Planning Commission public hearing on Thursday, January 24, 2013.

    (Christopher Chung/ The Press Democrat)

Wal-Mart's plan to expand its Rohnert Park store by adding a grocery store overcame on Thursday the Planning Commission roadblock it ran into in 2010. This time, planners approved the project's environmental impact report.

The decision delighted officials from Wal-Mart, which has pursued the project for at least four years.

"On behalf of our customers, we could not be more pleased," said company spokeswoman Amelia McLear at the meeting. "It speaks volumes for the need for jobs, community reinvestment and one-stop shopping."

The environmental report for the project had been revised after opponents in 2010 challenged it in court, leading a Sonoma County judge to rule in 2011 that sections of it dealing with traffic and noise needed to be redone. Rohnert Park Planning and Building Manager Marilyn Ponton had recommended the revised report's approval.

Many of the same opponents who battled the project in 2010 were at Thursday's hearing, and the decision visibly deflated them.

"I'm very disappointed," said Marty Bennett, co-chairman of the Living Wage Coalition, which had rallied opposition to the project.

"We feel we raised all the right issues here," he said, "and this should not be going forward."

But supporters whose hopes were dashed three years ago were exuberant, smiling broadly as they left the Rohnert Park City Hall and replaying comments they'd made to the commissioners during the public comment period.

Commissioners in 2010 rejected the environmental report, saying the Wal-Mart expansion would likely be detrimental in a city which already had seven grocers. They also worried at the time that the project would violate the city's general plan, which encourages grocery stores in neighborhoods.

But on Thursday the commission barely touched on the issues it considered in 2010, instead defining its purview as being simply to assess whether the report had been revised adequately in the areas that the court had ordered.

© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View