The Los Angeles Times is reporting a possible breakthrough in the bitter stalemate between the A's and Giants about which team owns the rights to Santa Clara County and whether the A's can build a ballpark in San Jose.
Then again, the Los Angeles Times may not be reporting a breakthrough.
Let's try to make sense of this.
According to the Times, Major League Baseball has provided the A's with tentative guidelines to move to San Jose. The Times could not determine what these guidelines are. Even if the A's satisfy these guidelines, no guarantee exists that commissioner Bud Selig would approve the move.
So this new development is pretty murky. Selig formed a task force four years ago to untangle this mess but the task force hasn't exactly been forceful in coming up with a judgment.
That shouldn't stop us from being forceful and examining the issues — primarily the issue of fairness. That is the big one.
One way of looking at fairness
The A's are victims of the Giants' greed, and that's not fair. No team should control an entire California county if their ballpark is in another county. It's just plain selfishness and does not speak well of the Giants' ability to work and play well with others. It's also a restraint of trade.
The Giants are already doing quite well in the attendance department. They should be good sports and allow the A's to build a baseball palace in San Jose, where they can make a ton of dough and sign good players to long-term contracts. With a new park, the A's would not have to be cheapskates anymore.
The Giants getting rights to Santa Clara County was a fluke in the first place. Walter Haas, the A's late owner, gave his friend Bob Lurie rights to Santa Clara County so the Giants could move there if they wanted to. The Giants weren't drawing well in Candlestick Park. Because the Giants never moved to Santa Clara County, it's unfair of them to put a death grip on San Jose.
That's what the A's assert, and it is a major point in the A's fairness argument. And it is a cogent point.
Except that the Giants dispute it. They say Haas did not cede Santa Clara County to the Giants contingent upon the Giants moving there. Haas simply ceded it.
The two teams can't even agree on history.
The other way of looking at fairness
The Giants are in the business of doing business. That means they want to maximize profits, and it is not their business to aid and abet a competitor that wants to cut into their fan base.
When the new ownership group bought the Giants, one key condition was control of Santa Clara County where lots of Giants fans live. If Major League Baseball abrogates that precondition of sale, it would be unfair. Serious lawsuits might result.
Looking for a sensible solution
As you can see, both teams are able to make the fairness argument. And that means we must look beyond mere fairness for a real-world, viable solution.
Let's say the A's can meet the new conditions to move, whatever those conditions are. Let's say Selig approves the move. Those are big "let's says." I'm just saying. But let's say, anyway.
Read all of the PD's fire coverage here