75°
Cloudy
THU
 75°
 56°
FRI
 84°
 54°
SAT
 78°
 54°
SUN
 78°
 55°
MON
 82°
 53°

PD Editorial: Selling the idea of a strike on Syria

  • This artwork by Paul Tong relates to President Obama's recent warning to Syria about U.S. military intervention if there is use of chemical or biological weapons.

If there's a presidential lesson to be learned in September it's never draw a red line unless you're certain the nation sees red as well — and is standing with you.

At the moment, polls show President Barack Obama and the vast majority of Americans are standing sideways on the issue of a military strike against Syria. A recent survey by the Pew Research Center and USA Today in fact shows the number of adults opposed to Syrian air strikes is growing quickly — from 48 percent to 63 percent since the beginning of the month.

Meanwhile, those who support an attack in retaliation for the gassing of Syrian civilians has remained unchanged at about 28 percent.

The president will have an opportunity to win public — and Congressional — support tonight during his nationally televised address. (6 p.m. PST.) But he has his work cut out for him.

First, he needs to present clear and convincing evidence that not only were hundreds of innocent Syrian civilians gassed on Aug. 21 but that the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, without a doubt, was directly behind the attack. Americans have been misled before and are understandably wary of claims that clear evidence exists but cannot be produced for security reasons. If Obama has any hope of building public support, he and Secretary of State John Kerry need to bring something more than "trust us."

Second, the president needs to explain how America can launch a surgical strike that will achieve the dual objectives of punishing Assad for crossing the proverbial line in using chemical weapons without sucking the United States into another full-scale military confrontation in the Middle East.

Meanwhile, claims by Assad last weekend during a Charlie Rose interview that his regime was not to blame for the chemical weapons attack — and his warning that America should "expect everything" in the way of retaliatory action — has only fueled public uncertainty.

Finally, Obama needs to persuade the nation that a military response is the only means for accomplishing the nation's goals and that the United States would have the broad support of a coalition of other countries if it chooses to take that course.

Over the weekend, Kerry claimed that the nations that were ready to support U.S. action were in the "double digits." But he reportedly did not name them.

Winning Congressional support — particularly from House members who are just returning from a five-week summer recess where they've been getting an earful from constituents — also will hinge on the president making his case on these three fronts.


© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View