A first-of-its-kind program in California requiring Santa Rosa to offset pollution from its wastewater treatment plant by cleaning up other problem properties in the watershed is struggling to find enough suitable projects.
The city's Board of Public Utilities voted last week not to pursue a once-promising project to clean up a former dairy property where massive piles of cow manure sit less than 100 feet from Windsor Creek.
During a closed session, the board voted 6-0 to terminate negotiations with Marvin Nunes, the owner of the 177-acre Ocean View Dairy property west of Windsor, and a Rocklin broker that had sought to sell offsetting credits to the city, Wildlands Capital Partners LLC.
The setback demonstrates how difficult it is proving for the city to meet some of the strictest pollution control regulations imposed on any treatment plant in the state, said board chairman Stephen Gale.
"We're the first in the state with this particular regulation, and there are always challenges when you are on the leading edge," Gale said.
The city recycles about 98 percent of its treated wastewater, most of it through a 42-mile pipeline to The Geysers geothermal power plants, where it is injected underground to create steam. But the Llano Road treatment plant still needs to discharge about 2 percent of its treated water to the Laguna de Santa Rosa in a typical year, depending on the weather.
The Laguna is listed as an "impaired waterway" because of its levels of pollution, sediment and high summer temperatures, all of which create an inhospitable environment for aquatic wildlife. Juvenile cold-water fish such as threatened steelhead trout and endangered coho salmon are particularly vulnerable to such conditions.
So while regulators at the state North Coast Water Quality Control Board study how much waste the city should be permitted to safely discharge into the Laguna, they are requiring the city to adhere to a "zero net load" policy. That means if the plant puts in 50,000 pounds of nitrogen and phosphorus in a year, which is typical, it has to prevent the same amount of pollution from reaching the Laguna from other parts of the watershed.
But finding those potential projects, analyzing their value to the Laguna and getting them approved by the water board is proving confounding for the city.
In one case, the city spent more than two years and $300,000 trying to get regulators to approve a project to remove the invasive weed ludwigia from the Laguna. After what the city describes as a series of mixed signals from the board, the plan was never approved.