<b>Do no harm</b>
EDITOR: Among the explanations verging on excuses offered by law enforcement for the killing of an innocent child by a Sonoma County deputy, the one that rings out is that the deputies feared for their lives. Really?
We give a person a job as a peace officer, arm him with a gun and then authorize him to shoot simply because he is fearful?
This newspaper reported that police only have three-quarters of a second to decide whether to use deadly force ("Law officers trained to take out threat," Saturday). That isn't enough time to think, never mind to ask a question. So our public policy appears to endorse shooting first and asking questions later.
We are not at war in Sonoma County; we do not have martial law. We need our law enforcement officers to keep the peace, not disturb it. Law enforcement officers should consider the ethics taught to the healing professions: first, do no harm.
EDITOR: Upon returning from a week's vacation I was faced with past Press Democrat editions containing articles regarding the untimely death of Andy Lopez. A couple things stood out for me, one being I wasn't there and neither were you, so all the rampant speculation as to what happened is disconcerting.
Another issue is the use of school buses to transport protesters. Who authorized the use of taxpayer dollars for the use of the buses? Is protesting a part of curriculum now?