We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, nearly 1.5 million people used their mobile devices to visit our sites.
Already a subscriber?
Wow! You read a lot!
Reading enhances confidence, empathy, decision-making, and overall life satisfaction. Keep it up! Subscribe.
Already a subscriber?
Oops, you're out of free articles.
Until next month, you can always look over someone's shoulder at the coffee shop.
Already a subscriber?
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, we posted 390 stories about the fire. And they were shared nearly 137,000 times.
Already a subscriber?
Supporting the community that supports us.
Obviously you value quality local journalism. Thank you.
Already a subscriber?
Oops, you're out of free articles.
We miss you already! (Subscriptions start at just 99 cents.)
Already a subscriber?

When 12 Cleveland police officers were involved in a deadly shooting following a high-speed chase in August, the mayor of East Cleveland quickly spoke out, calling it "horrific."

Last week, when the shooting of a mentally ill man by Dallas police touched off anger in Texas, the mayor spoke up calling a video of the shooting "disturbing," and pledged to have the issue investigated quickly.

History books are filled with the words of elected officials and leaders — Abraham Lincoln, Winston Churchill, FDR, etc. — who rose up in moments of crisis to galvanize nations and communities.

So where are Santa Rosa's elected city leaders in the wake of one of the most tragic shootings in Sonoma County's history? Nowhere to be seen or heard.

For reasons that defy common sense — and standard practice in most cities — the City Council is under strict orders by City Attorney Caroline Fowler and City Manager Kathy Millison to say nothing about the shooting of 13-year-old Andy Lopez and to refer all questions and requests for media interviews to the Police Department.

At a time when the city most needs a voice, it's been taken for dubious legal reasons.

To make matters worse, city officials made the rash decision to cancel Tuesday's City Council meeting and shut down City Hall because of a protest march that started two blocks away at Old Courthouse Square — and ended peacefully three miles away at the Sonoma County Sheriff's Office.

In doing so, they cited "hostile postings about the city on social media." Hostile postings? Given the quality of online commentary these days, one hopes this doesn't become the standard for determining when Santa Rosa holds office hours. Or it may be a while before residents see the insides of City Hall again.

What is going on with Santa Rosa's government leaders? Has nobody reminded them that they represent the public — and that the city manager and city attorney report to them?

In contrast, Sonoma County's supervisors have been highly visible in the nine days since the tragic shooting, participating in community vigils, funerals, meetings and the like. Board Chairman David Rabbitt joined Sheriff Steve Freitas in authoring a Close to Home piece that pushed for calm and pledged to work toward ensuring something similar doesn't happen again.

Two Santa Rosa school board members as well as the school superintendent were in attendance at Tuesday's march, which, despite warnings about outside agitators, was made up of mostly of students and families from the Santa Rosa area.

Sadly, the real outsiders of the week have been Santa Rosa city officials, most of whom have chosen to sit this one out. The exceptions are City Council members Gary Wysocky, who joined in Tuesday's march, and Julie Combs, both of whom have been speaking in defiance of Fowler's directive.

The oddity is that this shooting did not technically occur in Santa Rosa, but rather a couple of blocks outside of the city limits. The city's only official role, despite being widely regarded as ground zero in this deputy-involved shooting, is as lead investigator.

Despite that, nobody expects that Mayor Scott Bartley or his colleagues on the City Council would divulge critical new information about the shooting. Nor should any reasonable person expect that a plea for nonviolence, a pledge for thorough review or a compassionate remark directed toward the grieving family would somehow compromise that investigation.

Road Repair Projects

Ferguson Road Mile Marker 10–11.31 (Pavement chip seal)

Furlong Road Mile Marker 10-11.73 (Pavement chip seal)

Poplar Avenue Mile Marker 10-11 (Pavement chip seal)

Bohemian Highway Mile Marker 13.93–18.78 (Pavement overlay)

Grove Street Mile Marker 11.79–13.87 (Pavement overlay)

River Road Mile Marker 30.00-34.21 (Pavement overlay)

Willowside Road Mile Marker 10.16-11.17 (Pavement repair)

Wallace Road Mile Marker 10-11.49 (Pavement repair)

River Road Mile Marker 30-34.24 (Ditching)

Los Alamos Road Mile Marker 10.94-14.30 (Ditching)

Bohemian Highway Mile Marker 10-13.60 (Ditching)

Ross Road Mile Marker 10.61-11.86 (Ditching)

Neeley Road Mile Marker 14.92 (Viaduct replacement)

Summerhome Park Road Mile Marker 10.41 (Viaduct replacement)

Porter Creek Road Mile Marker 19.89–20.19 (Pavement grind and patch)

River Road Mile Marker 12.14–12.54 (Pavement grind and patch)

Tomales Road Mile Marker 10-10.30 (Pavement grind and patch)

Arnold Drive Mile Marker 13.30-13.60 (Pavement grind and patch)

Mountain Road Mile Marker 10.54 (Culvert replacement)

Coleman Valley Road Mile Marker 17.57 (Culvert replacement)

Salmon Creek Road Mile Marker 12.29 (Culvert replacement)

Chiquita Road Mile Marker 11.69 (Culvert replacement)

Bonness Road Mile Marker 10.13 (Culvert replacement)

Bonness Road Mile Marker 10.42 (Culvert replacement)

Lytton Station Road Mile Marker 11.14 (Culvert replacement)

Lytton Station Road Mile Marker 11.16 (Culvert replacement)

West Dry Creek Road Mile Marker 14.96 (Culvert replacement)

West Dry Creek Road Mile Marker 10.45 (Culvert replacement)

Windsor Road Mile Marker 11.99 (Culvert replacement)

Windsor Road Mile Marker 12.21 (Culvert replacement)

Irwin Lane Mile Marker 11.19 (Culvert replacement)

The public has a right and expectation that their elected officials will stand up and speak for them in times like this. The council's acquiescence to the mandates of a city attorney and city manager whose track record show a predisposition to secrecy is shameful. So is the response to those who are turning to the city for discussion and answers and are instead getting the silent treatment.

Show Comment