Santa Rosa is preparing to tackle one of the thorniest issues related to the arrival of commuter rail service to the city — where people should be allowed to cross the tracks.
The city this week begins a formal study of a controversial plan to eliminate one railroad crossing near downtown in order to be allowed to build another one a mile north.
With trains set to rumble down the tracks by 2016, the city has been searching for a way to help pedestrians and bicyclists safely cross the tracks at Jennings Avenue, an east-west road bisected by the rail line just south of Coddingtown Mall.
Jennings Avenue Rail Crossing
Numerous businesses and apartment buildings line either side of the tracks near Jennings Avenue, and area residents — including dozens of schoolchildren — have for decades crossed the rails as a shortcut.
The City Council considered several options to fix that potentially hazardous situation, including building an overcrossing or an undercrossing or just allowing the Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit Authority to put up walls or fences to keep people out.
But the council ultimately decided that a ground-level, or at-grade, crossing made the most sense.
There's just one problem. To get permission for such a new crossing at Jennings, state Public Utilities Commission officials will require the city to close at least one of several streets that cross the tracks near Railroad Square.
The idea is rankling several Railroad Square business and property owners who say it jeopardizes their livelihoods and could limit the development potential around the future rail station.
"Closing off a street in Railroad Square is penny-wise and pound foolish," said Allen Thomas, a West End resident and former planning commissioner hired by Western Farm Center to represent its interests. "It's basically taking one problem and trading it for a whole other set of problems."
The commission's goal is to decrease the number of at-grade rail crossings in the state to reduce the risk of rail collisions. Staff members have told the city it will not approve a new crossing unless an equal or greater number are eliminated from the same area, explained Christopher Chow, a spokesman for the CPUC.