Federal appeals court takes up Marin oyster farm case Tuesday

  • The Drakes Bay Oyster Farm near Inverness, on Thursday, November 29, 2012. U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said he will shut down the oyster farm at Point Reyes National Seashore, designating the site as a wilderness area. (Christopher Chung/ The Press Democrat)

Drakes Bay Oyster Co.'s fight for survival, which has divided West Marin County neighbors and gained national attention, resumes Tuesday at a federal courthouse in San Francisco.

Three judges from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear 40 minutes of arguments from attorneys for oyster farm operator Kevin Lunny and former Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, who ordered the farm's closure in November.

Lunny's legal challenge, alleging that Salazar's decision was "arbitrary and capricious," has attracted support from Republicans in Congress and gained the free services of three private law firms and a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit group with connections to the arch-conservative billionaire Koch brothers.

Supporters contend it's a case of the federal government riding roughshod over a small, family-owned farm, while critics say it has become a pawn of the movement to open public lands to commercial enterprise.

In court, the oyster farm case involves labyrinthine questions of law, public policy and allegations of scientific misconduct by the National Park Service in evaluating the impact of harvesting 8 million oysters a year from Drakes Estero, a federally protected estuary in the Point Reyes National Seashore.

But none of those issues will be resolved by the appeals court, at least not at this stage.

Instead, Lunny is seeking a court order allowing him to continue raising Pacific oysters in the 2,500-acre estero, a home to fish, migrating birds, bat rays, leopard sharks and one of California's largest harbor seal colonies.

Five miles of wooden oyster-growing racks also are spread around the shallow estuary, where the tasty mollusks, prized by Bay Area chefs, have been raised since the 1930s.

If at least two of the appellate judges agree, the case will be returned to a federal district court in Oakland, where a judge in February rejected Lunny's claims, prompting his appeal to the 9th Circuit.

But without the court order, which one of Lunny's attorneys said would "preserve the status quo," the case and his business may effectively come to an end.

© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View