PD Editorial: Finding a way to prevent the next tragedy

  • 11/27/2013:B3: Demonstrators protesting the shooting of Andy Lopez by sheriff's Deputy Erick Gelhaus chant Tuesday as they march toward the Sonoma County Sheriff's Office at the county government center in Santa Rosa.

    PC: Demonstrators chant and march down Paulin Drive from Administration Drive, towards the Sonoma County Sheriff's Office, during a protest march over the shooting death of Andy Lopez in Santa Rosa, Calif., on November 26, 2013. Lopez, a 13-year-old, was shot and killed by a Sonoma County sheriff's deputy on October 22, 2013 , while he was walking with an airsoft pellet gun that resembled an AK-47 assault rifle. (Alvin Jornada / The Press Democrat)

Erick Gelhaus returned to work last week following a preliminary finding announced by Assistant Sheriff Lorenzo Due?s:

"We're not done yet," Due?s cautioned. "I'm just saying that based on what we know and based on what we have, it doesn't look like there was a violation of policy."

Gelhaus, of course, is the deputy who shot Andy Lopez, a 13-year-old Santa Rosa boy carrying a BB gun that closely resembled an assault rifle.

His return to duty, on a desk job, sparked a new round of demonstrations, but the sheriff's findings weren't any big surprise. Law enforcement officers are given broad discretion to use deadly force when they believe their lives or the lives of others are in danger, and they're seldom second-guessed by their supervisors — at least publicly.

That's why another development, largely overshadowed by the protests, shouldn't be overlooked.

Sonoma County supervisors have ordered a review of police training and operations, including the policies governing the use of lethal force.

The review, to be completed in the first half of 2014, was one of several actions taken by the Board of Supervisors on Dec. 3. Among the others were endorsing an Andy Lopez memorial park, allocating $250,000 to buy lapel cameras for sheriff's deputies and creating a task force to make recommendations about citizen oversight of law enforcement and community policing, a model that promotes increased contact between peace officers and the public.

They're all commendable responses, but two — the review of training and operations and community policing — stand out. Why? They focus on what happens <i>before</i> shots are fired, rather than on assessing what happened <i>after</i> shots are fired.

A lethal force policy must balance officer safety with the risk of a tragic mistake, an Andy Lopez.

The existing policy might be the appropriate balance. It may need to be adjusted. It ought to be the subject of regular scrutiny, and the results of the county's inquiry should be presented publicly to ensure that citizens understand when and why law enforcement officers are authorized to use deadly force.

comments powered by Disqus
© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View