s
s
Sections
Sections
Subscribe
You've read 5 of 15 free articles this month.
Support local journalism and get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app, all starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read 10 of 15 free articles this month.
Support local journalism and get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app, all starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read all of your free articles this month.
Support local journalism and get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app, all starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
We've got a special deal for readers like you.
Support local journalism and get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app, all starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
Thanks for reading! Why not subscribe?
Support local journalism and get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app, all starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
Want to keep reading? Subscribe today!
Ooops! You're out of free articles. Starting at just 99 cents per month, you can keep reading all of our products and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?

A proposal to put a $10 increase in vehicle registration fees on the June ballot was narrowly rejected by Sonoma County transit officials in a special meeting Friday.

The fee would have raised $105 million over 20 years for buses, school safety programs and bike and pedestrian paths.

The vote of the 12-member board was 6-5, with 7 votes needed to pass. It was rejected because some members of the Transportation Authority said the measure was being rushed to the June ballot without careful consideration and it was not clear why the money was allocated as it was proposed.

They instead want more discussion with the possibility of putting the measure on the November ballot.

"We have to find out what is achievable with the public," said Petaluma Councilman David Glass. "People are not going to vote to pass something if they don't recognize the need and the gap that will be filled."

Sonoma Councilwoman Laurie Gallian said there was no chance for public input in the rush to meet the March 12 deadline to place the measure on the June ballot and it remained unclear why the money was divided the way it was in the measure.

"The analysis, the discussion, to the public really did not explain what the loss of funding was that this supplemented," Gallian said. "I had a question that 20 years was too long. What happens when the economy recovers?"

Proponents of a June vote, however, said pushing the measure to a November ballot would mean it must compete with other revenue measures, including the State Parks Foundation's own $18 vehicle fee increase for parks.

"I think it's still a good idea, I think it'll be difficult to get it passed in November," said Sebastopol Vice Mayor Guy Wilson. "I'm disappointed it didn't get on the June ballot."

Wilson's vote followed the direction of the Sebastopol City Council which met Friday morning and voted 5-0 to support placing the fee on the June ballot.

Rohnert Park Councilman Jake Mackenzie, who voted against the measure at the instructions of his City Council, chairs the authority board and said he expects the proposal to come back with a November target.

The measure proposed allocating 68 percent of the money, or about $3.2 million a year, for Sonoma County's four bus systems to restore some of the service cuts made the past three years because of state funding reductions.

In the first year, the measure would have allocated $88,000 for Healdsburg, $431,000 for Petaluma, $1.2 million for Santa Rosa and $1.9 million for Sonoma County bus transit operations.

The Safe Routes to School program that provides education and street safety improvements to encourage children to walk or bicycle to school would have been allocated 15 percent, or $750,000 a year.

Proponents contend that vehicle trips to school are the largest single traffic generator and eliminating those trips would help Sonoma County reach its goal to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

There would have been 12 percent, or $600,000 a year, for building bicycle and pedestrian paths.

The Sonoma County Transportation Authority, which coordinates transit funding for the county, would have gotten 5 percent for administration costs.

The Cloverdale and Healdsburg city councils opposed the measure, saying it was rushed and it was not clear what the benefits for the cities were, while Rohnert Park opposed it because the city has its own half-cent sales tax on the June ballot.

In addition to Sebastopol, the city of Santa Rosa endorsed the measure, while Sonoma, Cotati and Windsor councils did not meet prior to Friday's vote. The measure was drafted within the past two weeks and would need to have been submitted to the registrar of voters by 5 p.m. Friday to qualify for the June ballot.