The 2010 grape harvest that started last week is one for the history books — and for all the wrong reasons.
The economy has decimated grape prices and stalled sales, and Mother Nature continues to deliver one nasty blow after another.
About 20 percent of Sonoma County's grapes are still unsold, with only a few weeks to go. In normal years, nearly everything is usually sold by this point. And when grapes are selling, the prices for some varietals have fallen nearly in half.
Already growers are comparing the harvest to 1974 and 2000, when grape gluts combined with economic downturns to roil the wine-grape market.
But unlike those tough years, a glut is not expected this harvest. The forecast is for a slightly smaller haul of about 190,000 tons — about 5 percent below normal.
This year will instead be remembered for its awful economy and incessant natural calamities.
"I've never experienced anything like this," said Duff Bevill, a veteran grower and founder of Bevill Vineyard Management in Healdsburg. "Everybody likes to compare it to the Depression. It's not, but it's the closest thing to date."
Growers who managed to find buyers in recent weeks received prices between $1,000 and $1,800 a ton — and even lower, depending on the varietal, according to some farmers.
"Some of the growers can't stay in the business at these prices," said Brian Clements, a wine broker at Turrentine Brokerage in Novato. "The price decline ... has been huge."
In 2008, Sonoma County farmers got $2,240 per ton on average, with varietals such as pinot noir fetching an average $3,170 a ton.
Options for growers with unsold grapes are dwindling. They now likely face three choices: Sell their grapes at or below cost; let the fruit rot on the vine and save the cost of picking it; or pay a custom-crush facility to turn their crop into wine and gamble someone will buy it in the future.
"There could be some grapes left on the vine because the grower made that choice," said Nick Frey, president of the Sonoma County Winegrape Commission. "And there might be some left on the vine because there were no buyers."
Increasingly, farmers are just resigned to surviving this harvest.
"We need to get through this year and minimize damage," Frey said.
North Coast growers were initially spared the impact of the recession because of market mechanics and circumstances dating back to 2008.
Grape prices are largely set by bottle prices, meaning how much retailers can charge consumers for the wine. During the boom years, many people were willing to pay $50 or more for a bottle of wine. That drove up the price of North Coast premium grapes.
But the recession began eroding that high-end market.
A spring freeze in 2008 resulted in a small Sonoma County crop of 168,992 tons — about 15percent below normal. That shortage helped artificially support grape prices just as consumers began turning away from high-priced wines due to the worsening economy.
Then the 2009 harvest resulted in a larger crop of 212,674 tons. That surplus filled the inventories of wineries during the last winter and set up the tough market conditions for this year.
By this spring, it became clear that consumers were not going to quickly drink down those stockpiles of high-end wine. The rule of thumb in business is that large inventories are bad during a recession, and that meant wineries didn't want to commit to buying more grapes that would increase their stockpiles.