The proposed bicycle and pedestrian bridge over Highway 101 may become the first project blown away by the changing political winds in Santa Rosa following a dramatic City Council meeting that put the plan in peril.
The possibility of losing a project dear to cycling advocates outraged Mayor Susan Gorin, who denounced her colleagues as shortsighted, and reduced Councilwoman Veronica Jacobi to tears.
"It's painful that this wonderful project's in jeopardy and I can't do anything about it," said Jacobi, who lost her reelection bid and was overcome with emotion Tuesday night as she read a series of resolutions aimed at pushing the planning process forward.
Technically, several measures backing the proposed span and authorizing additional studies passed on 5-2 votes Tuesday, which should have been cause for its advocates to celebrate. Councilmembers Jane Bender and Ernesto Olivares, who is likely to become the city's next mayor, voted against it, citing concerns about the cost and timing.
But Councilman John Sawyer, who shared the concerns of Bender and Olivares, cast a vote for the project — and said he was only voting "yes" for the sole purpose of reconsidering his vote at next week's meeting, when new council members take office.
By then, Sawyer and Olivares will have two new allies on the council, Jake Ours and Scott Bartley, and if the item was revisited, the group would have the votes to halt the proposed bicycle and pedestrian bridge.
It is not certain that will occur, but Gorin was exasperated by the possibility, making a lengthy, impassioned argument outlining the economic and social merits of the project and chastising Sawyer for his tactic.
She said the $100,000 in redevelopment funds was a "drop in the bucket" compared to the value the bridge could bring to the lives of college students, the city's reputation as a cycling destination and economic development for the city.
"This is penny-wise and pound-foolish! I am shocked, I am absolutely shocked!" Gorin said, turning to face Sawyer, her voice quavering with emotion. "I'm going to be extremely disappointed if you vote for this for the purpose of reconsideration."
If Sawyer had voted against the project, it still would have passed on a 4-3 vote, with Gorin, Jacobi, Gary Wysocky and Marsha Vas Dupre backing it. But by voting in the majority, Sawyer retains the right to ask that the item be reconsidered next week. Members who vote in the minority have no such right.