s
s
Sections
Sections
Subscribe
You've read 5 of 15 free articles this month.
Support local journalism and get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app, all starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read 10 of 15 free articles this month.
Support local journalism and get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app, all starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read all of your free articles this month.
Support local journalism and get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app, all starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
We've got a special deal for readers like you.
Support local journalism and get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app, all starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
Thanks for reading! Why not subscribe?
Support local journalism and get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app, all starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
Want to keep reading? Subscribe today!
Ooops! You're out of free articles. Starting at just 99 cents per month, you can keep reading all of our products and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?

The state Attorney General is conducting an audit of the Sonoma State University Academic Foundation and its loans to former board member Clem Carinalli.

SSU President Ruben Armi?na, who serves as chairman of the foundation, disclosed the audit in an e-mail sent late Friday to faculty and staff.

?We have supplied the Attorney General with all documentation requested and will continue to be responsive to the Attorney General?s requests,? according to the e-mail, which was sent by Armi?na and three other members of the foundation?s executive committee.

Armi?na and other university officials with direct knowledge of the loans again refused to answer questions on Monday. They have declined requests for interviews made over the last two weeks following a surprise disclosure in Carinalli?s bankruptcy proceedings that disputed previous claims by the administration.

The SSU foundation could be forced to return a $232,500 payment from Carinalli under a provision of bankruptcy law intended to protect one creditor from receiving preferential treatment over another.

The Attorney General notified the foundation of the audit on Oct. 16, following months of criticism from SSU faculty and local politicians regarding more than $20 million in private loans made by the foundation to local land owners.

Carinalli received at least $9.6 million in loans from the foundation, the first coming in 1995 two days after he resigned from its board of directors. The Attorney General specifically requested financial documents involving Carinalli, according to the university.

The president of the California Faculty Association, which represents 23,000 faculty statewide, including 500 at Sonoma State University, requested the investigation in a letter sent July 6 to Attorney General Edmund Brown.

?We sent it because we were concerned,? said Alice Sunshine, a spokeswoman for the association. ?There are things going on there that raised a lot of questions.?

The attorney general?s office conducts audits of nonprofits ?to detect cases in which directors and trustees have mismanaged, defrauded, or wrongfully diverted funds from the charity,? according to its Web site. If the attorney general?s office determines that the foundation board members acted inappropriately, it could sue them to recoup the money.

The attorney general?s office declined to describe the extent of the foundation audit, or even if it was conducting a review.

?We don?t deny or confirm that an investigation is ongoing,? said Abraham Arredondo, a spokesman for the attorney general?s office.

Foundation executives also used Friday?s e-mail to explain why statements they made as recently as this month were inconsistent with public records.

Larry Furukawa-Schlereth, the university?s chief financial officer, had told The Press Democrat in a taped interview on July 9 that both outstanding loans to Carinalli ? one for $232,500 and another for $1.25 million ? were secured with property.

As recently as this month, university officials continued to say they learned the loan was unsecured only well after July 9.

However, the university conducted a title search this summer and learned that the loan was not secured with collateral prior to the July 9 interview, according to the statement sent to faculty and staff. It informed Carinalli of this fact sometime in early July, according to the university.

County land records show that all five properties Carinalli used as collateral for the $232,500 loan were removed in 2005.

University executives stated that while their title search determined its collateral had been removed from the loan, a conversation with Carinalli made them believe it was, in fact, still secured with property.

?On July 8, Mr. Carinalli told the foundation that he believed the loan was still secured and that an error must have occurred with the county records,? according to Friday?s e-mail. ?Based on this information, the foundation believed that Mr. Carinalli was correct that an error had occurred, and that all of the loans should still be backed by property.?

Carinalli said he did not learn that all the properties had been removed until someone from the foundation notified him about a week before July 9.

By July 8, Carinalli had already started using four of those properties to secure another loan, he said earlier this month. He received the new loan of $232,500 on July 9 and used it to repay the foundation on that same day.

The e-mail sent by foundation executives Friday did not explain how all five properties were removed as collateral for the loan.

Carinalli?s loan agreement allowed him to repay some of the loan, and in return receive some of the collateral back, according to county land records.

The university said Carinalli repaid $500,000 in 2005. Carinalli said he only asked for a partial return of his collateral at that time. Under the law, the foundation is the only entity authorized to release the properties securing the loan.

A second audit of the foundation is being conducted by the California State University Trustees? internal auditor, according to the university. The audit is part of a routine procedure completed every three years and reported to the CSU Board of Trustees, SSU spokeswoman Susan Kashack said. Armi?na pledged to make the audit public when it is completed.

?On behalf of the entire Foundation Board, we are committed to being as transparent as we are legally able. We will continue to the very best of our abilities to be trustworthy stewards of funds donated to our academic and student programs,? the foundation?s executive committee stated.

The note was authored by Armi?na, Furukawa-Schlereth, foundation president Patricia McNeil and foundation secretary/chief financial officer Letitia Coate.

Armi?na and the other executives also announced Friday that the university would no longer comment on the loans to Carinalli.

?The Foundation has not and is not able to respond to media requests for further information on this matter because it is the subject of bankruptcy litigation and because the Foundation cannot engage in speculation,? the e-mail stated.

While Sonoma State is listed as a creditor in Carinalli?s bankruptcy proceeding, it is not currently named in any litigation, said Carinalli?s attorney, Merle Meyers.

However, Meyers and other bankruptcy attorneys believe the university will likely have to return a $232,500 payment it received from Carinalli on July 9. The payment, which fully repaid one of Carinalli?s outstanding loans, will probably be viewed by the court as preferential treatment because it occurred during the 90-day period before Carinalli filed bankruptcy, Meyers said.

The university also decided to stop commenting on the Carinalli loans because of the Attorney General?s audit, Kashack said.

?The attorney general is doing their own investigation and we don?t want to do anything that might influence that,? she said.