Mostly sunny

Money OK'd for Healdsburg bridge restoration

  • 8/27/2010: B2:

    7/31/2010: B1: [Healdsburg Memorial Bridge]

    11/24/2009:A1: IMPROVING ITS SCORE: On a scale of 1 to 100, with 1 being the worst, a Caltrans assessment in 1979 led to the Healdsburg Avenue Bridge receiving a sufficiency rating of 2. But recent emergency reinforcements improved the bridge's rating to 46. Still, the City of Healdsburg began advertising for consultants to conduct a review on whether to replace the bridge.

    PC: The soundness of the Healdsburg bridge is not as bad off as Caltrans first thought. Instead of a 2 rating-with one being the worst- the bridge is now given a score of 47. That being said, officials are still spending over $1 million to investigate replacing or retrofitting the nearly 90 year-old span. (Kent Porter / Press Democrat) 2009

Healdsburg City Hall apparently has convinced state and federal officials to spend millions of dollars to fix up a historic bridge over the Russian River.

Despite the initial qualms of Caltrans and federal highway engineers, Healdsburg officials obtained tentative approval for an approximate $12 million to $13 million upgrade of Healdsburg Memorial Bridge.

"It's big, excellent news. We walked away from the meeting feeling we really accomplished something," Vice Mayor Gary Plass said Wednesday of a recent meeting with the engineers.

Representatives from the Federal Highway Administration were willing to authorize the repairs to the 90-year-old bridge based on several conditions, one of which obligates the city to pay to maintain it in the future, said Plass and Public Works Director Mike Kirn, both of whom attended the meeting.

The cost of maintenance is estimated at $170,000 to $200,000 annually, Kirn said.

That is a significant enough sum that City Council members at their Jan. 3 meeting want to discuss how to pay for it and give the public a chance to weigh in.

"I think we want to commit," Plass said. "We need to make sure the community knows what it will take .<TH>.<TH>. it's tying our kids and our grandkids to maintain that bridge."

In a series of meetings and workshops last year to determine the bridge's future, residents overwhelmingly were in favor of keeping the 1920 steel-truss structure, as opposed to building a new, wider crossing, estimated to cost $25 million.

The City Council, bowing to preservationists and prevailing public opinion, made rehabilitation the "preferred alternative" for an ongoing environmental study of the bridge.

The rehab includes sandblasting and painting, repairing damaged structural members, installing a surface deck and making railing safety improvements. The city also wants to bolster the bridge to withstand flooding and erosion.

© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View