A federal jury in San Francisco on Thursday found that a Santa Rosa police sergeant violated the civil rights of an unarmed man when he shot him to death outside the man's home in 2007.
The eight-member jury concluded that the shooting of Richard DeSantis did not have a "legitimate law enforcement purpose" and awarded his family more than $500,000 in damages, plus attorneys' fees.
"The jury found that the officer violated the constitutional right of an unarmed mental patient," said family attorney Eric Safire. "This is big stuff."
The verdict was a blow to city officials, who fully backed the actions of all six officers who responded to the 911 call and spent nearly five years trying to get the lawsuit thrown out.
Police Chief Tom Schwedhelm, who attended the two-week trial, said the shooting was a "tragic situation" but stood by his officers' conduct.
"I am disappointed with the jury's verdict and continue to believe all department personnel in this matter acted appropriately," Schwedhelm said in a statement.
City Attorney Caroline Fowler, who served as lead attorney in the case, said she believed the jury's decision was "not supported by the evidence" and will ask the judge for a new trial.
DeSantis, a disabled ironworker, had gone off his medication for bipolar disorder in preparation for returning to work the Monday after Easter, 2007.
Around 1 p.m., he said he heard noises in the attic and began shooting a Glock semiautomatic pistol into the ceiling of his South Avenue home in Roseland in what his wife has called a manic episode. Patricia DeSantis called 911 for help.
When officers arrived, DeSantis was not wearing a shirt, had nothing in his hands, and initially complied with orders to get on the ground, Safire said. Patricia DeSantis testified that she told officers she had recovered the gun.