55°
Light fog
THU
 89°
 55°
FRI
 89°
 53°
SAT
 93°
 54°
SUN
 87°
 56°
MON
 88°
 55°

Monday's Letters to the Editor

<b>Critical issues</b>

EDITOR: Voters should be aware of some of the critical environmental issues that will come before the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors in the next four years. Susan Gorin is the candidate for the 1st District best qualified to deal with these issues.

Expanding development, increasing population and climate change will impact clean water supplies. Funds must be found to manage state and county parks and to open new parks on land owned by the Open Space District. The future of the Sonoma Developmental Center may affect the beautiful open space on its property. There will be opportunities to protect properties along the Sonoma Coast and to open new trails for the county's citizens who cherish healthy recreation, walking, biking and riding in natural beauty.

Endorsements from the Sierra Club, our pioneering environmental organization, and Sonoma County Conservation Action, which rates candidates' environmental records, are evidence that Gorin is the candidate with the experience and the lifetime values to intelligently address these issues. A vote for Susan Gorin is a vote for the preservation of the county's natural resources, scenic beauty and outdoor recreation facilities.

PAT ELIOT

Sonoma

<b>Pension laws</b>

EDITOR: So, let me see if I get this straight. The grand jury cities improprieties in the pension plan adopted by county supervisors 10 years ago. And the current supervisors had their attorneys review it only to find that, yes, there were problems, including that the pension cost has increased tenfold over the last 10 years and that employees only pay a fraction into the plan that was agreed upon. Surprise, surprise.

While the county's attorneys determined that the grand jury was correct that the law was not followed 10 years ago, they also determined that county supervisors followed the law closely enough because the word "shall" in the law is "directory" for the supervisors, not "mandatory" as it is for us little people. And that the supervisors "substantially complied" with the public notice requirement by whispering the proposed changes at some meeting or other.

The public should have heard and therefore should have known about the changes. Right? It's not the county supervisors' fault. They win. We lose. High five, people. Oh, by the way, that the current supervisors stand to benefit significantly from the pension plan is irrelevant. Smells like a fish.


© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View