s
s
Sections
Sections
Subscribe
You've read 5 of 15 free articles this month.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read 10 of 15 free articles this month.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read all of your free articles this month.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
We've got a special deal for readers like you.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting 99 cents per month and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?
Thanks for reading! Why not subscribe?
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting 99 cents per month and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?
Want to keep reading? Subscribe today!
Ooops! You're out of free articles. Starting at just 99 cents per month, you can keep reading all of our products and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?

If there's one baseball conversation that's guaranteed to induce conflicted feelings, it's the MVP conversation.

On one hand, come on. Who really gives a flying broken bat? It's just a bunch of sportswriters casting votes, elevating themselves into a realm of importance that's self-created and media-sustained. If a player leads his league in home runs, for example, no number of votes is going to take away that accomplishment. And if a player has a superb season by most reasonable standards, well, that superb season stands, whether he wins the Most Valuable Player Award or not.

On the other hand, few conversations among baseball aficionados can be more stimulating than those about the MVP Award and who most deserves it.

This year is a case in point, potentially offering some of the most intellectually ferocious give-and-take the anticipation of the MVP Award has stirred in years.

In the National League, the three leading MVP candidates are considered to be Buster Posey of the Giants, Andrew McCutchen of the Pirates and Ryan Braun of the Brewers. OK, personal feelings aside (Posey, slam dunk, if the word "valuable" isn't exclusively defined by the usual numbers), certainly a lively debate could be had over the various merits of each of the NL MVP top contenders.

In the American League, a truly classic argument can be had over Miguel Cabrera of the Tigers vs. Mike Trout of the Angels. OK, once again, personal feelings aside (in good conscience, can you really pick against a Triple Crown winner? Methinks not), fans have two MVP contenders so strong, casting giant shadows over all other AL players, perhaps the only way out is a draw and have Cabrera and Trout share the award. That's right, co-MVPs. Not to get all lawyerly on you, but there is precedent. See 1979 NL co-MVPs Keith Hernandez and Willie Stargell.

All this contentious MVP talk might have some older fans remembering one of the greatest of such arguments, 50 years ago, when Maury Wills of the Dodgers won the NL MVP Award over Willie Mays of the Giants, 209 votes to 202. Surely older Giants fans remember it, and likely are still bitter over it. It still resonates, all these years later.

Wills' very good season was elevated to MVP-caliber by virtue of his astounding 104 stolen bases, breaking the single-season record of 94 that was set by Ty Cobb 47 years earlier. Oh, and here's something. Second to Wills in NL stolen bases in 1962? Dodgers teammate Willie Davis, with 32.

Not to minimize Wills' achievement (and, by the way, he won a Gold Glove at shortstop that season, too), but Mays' overall production, or "value," if you will, in 1962 was so much more ... breathtaking. His 49 homers led the league, his 141 RBIs were second, his .304 batting average was 11th, his .384 on-base percentage seventh, his .615 slugging percentage third, his 382 total bases first and his 36 doubles second.

Simply for the sake of friendly argument (albeit a 50-year-old one), it should be stated that Wills didn't rank in the top 12 in any of the just-mentioned categories. And, for the record, Mays, too, won a Gold Glove that season — in center field, of course, and led the NL-champion Giants with 18 steals.

But here's the thing that makes the 1962 MVP discussion as lively today as it was back in the day. It wasn't just Wills vs. Mays. Tommy Davis and Frank Robinson attracted 175 and 164 MVP votes, respectively.

Here's a statistical mini-capsule of Robinson's '62 season with the Reds: .342 batting average, 39 homers and 136 RBIs, also led the NL in doubles (51) and runs (134).

And how about Davis' 1962 season for the Dodgers: league-leading .346 batting average, league-leading 230 hits, with 27 homers and an NL-best 153 RBIs. Despite those numbers, some of which are truly monstrous, Davis was a virtual afterthought in the MVP voting in 1962, garnering only three out of a total of 20 first-place votes.

This isn't some old crank whining about how players of yesteryear were better. No. This is some old crank telling younger fans to savor this year's MVP discussions as some of us savored them 50 years ago. It's a lot of fun.

Just don't take the "official" vote all that seriously.

Robert Rubino can be reached at robert.rubino@pressdemocrat.com.