s
s
Sections
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, nearly 1.5 million people used their mobile devices to visit our sites.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Wow! You read a lot!
Reading enhances confidence, empathy, decision-making, and overall life satisfaction. Keep it up! Subscribe.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Oops, you're out of free articles.
Until next month, you can always look over someone's shoulder at the coffee shop.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, we posted 390 stories about the fire. And they were shared nearly 137,000 times.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Supporting the community that supports us.
Obviously you value quality local journalism. Thank you.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Oops, you're out of free articles.
We miss you already! (Subscriptions start at just 99 cents.)
Already a subscriber?
iPhone

A parade of speakers on Saturday called for district elections in Santa Rosa, saying the concept is more democratic and would bridge the city's economic and ethnic divide.

"The current system does not work for the most marginalized" residents, said Omar Gallardo, referring to the low-income Roseland and Apple Valley areas. "I encourage you to bring back democracy."

About three dozen members of Gallardo's group, the North Bay Organizing Project, attended a public hearing hosted by Santa Rosa's Charter Review Committee at the Utilities Field Operations building on Stony Point Road.

About 130 people attended the three-hour meeting to consider possible changes to the city charter, including a switch from citywide voting for all seven council members to separate voting in seven districts.

By unofficial count, 44 speakers favored district elections and two supported the status quo.

Boisterous applause followed some of the majority comments, voiced by whites, Latinos, blacks, academics, clergy, activists and residents from all quarters of the city.

Nineteen committee members, appointed by the council, made no comment. The committee, which previously had rejected district elections on a 10-6 straw vote, is expected to recommend charter amendments to the council in May.

The council will decide whether to put any amendments to a public vote in November.

"I don't want my city known for having an exclusionary attitude," said Rev. Curtis Byrd, who noted he is the second African-American appointed to the Planning Commission. "The time for change has passed."

Northeast Santa Rosa residents have long dominated the council and other policy-making boards, and in 145 years only two westside residents and two minorities have been elected to the council.

The Rev. R. Tim Carnahan took a humorous tack, saying that as a northeast neighborhood resident he ought to feel well-represented, but does not.

"They've never bothered to walk down the hill to my house," he said.

Judy Kennedy, a Burbank Gardens area resident, said that district elections would produce candidates "who represent the point of view of our neighbors and those who live and work nearby."

Andy Merrifield, a Sonoma State University political science professor who lives in Santa Rosa, gave the discussion an academic twist, describing the notion that northeast area residents know best as a "neocolonialist viewpoint."

Stephen Gale, a local Democratic Party leader, said he had "a sense of deja vu" at Saturday's meeting.

"Ten years ago you heard most of these same reasons" for district elections, he said. "The issue is before you now and it's not going to go away."

Keith Woods, chief executive officer of North Coast Builders Exchange in Santa Rosa, said he had served 10 years ago with Merrifield on the last charter review panel.

"I admire the passion in the room here," Woods said, but warned of "unintended consequences" from district elections.

Woods said he once lived in a city with 10 council districts that "created 10 small kingdoms" and forced council members to fight for one-tenth of everything done in the city, which he did not name.

Kirstin Merrihew, a Coddingtown area resident, said district elections would "balkanize Santa Rosa."

"We need to be a whole city, pulling together," she said, but allowed that it would be all right to put district elections to a vote.

Know Your Rights

California law prohibits lawyers or others acting on behalf of a lawyer from:

— Soliciting clients at an accident scene, at a hospital, or on the way to a hospital.

— Soliciting clients who, due to their physical, emotional or mental state, may not be able to have reasonable judgment about the hiring of an attorney .

— Seeking clients by mail unless the letter and envelope are clearly labeled as an advertisement.

— Promising a particular outcome from legal representation.

In the wake of the fires, there is also the risk of victims being approached by people posing as attorneys. Consumers should determine if they are legitimate and licensed to provide legal services. Before hiring an attorney, look up their name or State Bar number on the State Bar website — www.calbar.ca.gov — to check the status of their license to practice law and whether they have any record of discipline.

Source: State Bar of California

Lee Pierce, the city's first black council member who lost a bid for the state Assembly in 2010, said he used to favor citywide elections but now feels the system is not working.

"All we are saying here is take it to the people," Pierce said.

Three other charter topics — the Community Advisory Board, mayoral elections and binding arbitration — received scant attention.

The committee's next meeting is 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. Thursday at the Utilities Field Operations building, 35 Stony Point Road.

Show Comment