Gap in thinking
EDITOR: Do I have this right: The Republicans are comfortable accepting the notion that poor intelligence about weapons of mass destruction was the reason for our invasion of Iraq, yet they can't believe that poor intelligence was responsible for the initial explanation about what took place in Benghazi?
EDITOR: To GranFondo participants and supporters. Thank you for helping to make this year's GranFondo such a success. You and the GranFondo represent the very best things about cycling. You and the GranFondo mean more to me and Odessa than I can express.
I am writing to personally explain the events of the last few days in my own words and with my own voice. Much has and will be written about the USADA Reasoned Decision published on Oct. 10. On Wednesday, I released a formal statement published in the Wall Street Journal taking responsibility for my use of performance enhancing methods in a period which ended over five years ago. For this I have accepted a six-month ban from competitive cycling. I truly regret letting you down.
Jason Gay, a writer for the Wall Street Journal writing about the USADA decision said; "This is what honesty often looks like: messy and painful." And he is right. This admission was terrifying to confront, not because I was afraid of the truth — the truth meant a better sport, after all — but because I was afraid of how those I cared about would react. I didn't know whether they would be willing to understand why I made these choices and whether they would continue to invest and believe in the good that Odessa and I have tried to do with the notoriety this career has provided us.
There have been many changes for the better in cycling over the past five years, and I am committed to doing what I can to make these changes permanent. I don't want today's young riders to be discouraged from following their dreams. I want to do what I can to ensure that future riders are not faced with the same dilemmas I was.