PD Editorial: Wrong time to raise fees at UC, CSU

  • Gov. Jerry Brown speaks at the University of California Board of Regents meeting in San Francisco, Wednesday, Nov. 14, 2012. Brown is set to make his first appearance where he's expected to urge UC officials to control costs and avoid raising tuition. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)

Chalk one up to prudence: A week after state voters approved a tax increase, the leaders of California's university systems tabled proposals to impose new fees.

On Tuesday, University of California regents dropped plans to charge more for certain graduate and professional programs. On the same day, California State University trustees postponed action on proposed penalties for students who put off graduation, take excessive course loads or repeat classes.

Gov. Jerry Brown personally attended meetings of both governing boards this week, urging a hard line on costs and a moratorium on tuition increases.

"Right after the election is no time to be raising fees of any kind," he told CSU trustees at a meeting in Long Beach. "Voters gave us a billion dollars in new revenues, and now we have to use that very judiciously."

Brown is right. He and his allies targeted university campuses during the Proposition 30 campaign, and students responded. In pre-election polls, support was strongest among voters 18-29. And, according to Election Day exit polls, younger voters turned out in force, contributing to an unexpectedly easy victory for Proposition 30, which temporarily increases income taxes on the wealthy and sales taxes for all.

The failure of Proposition 30 would have triggered $250 million in midyear budget cuts for each university. CSU students were promised a $249 refund if it passed. To turn around and create a new fee a week after the election would have been a slap in the face.

CSU Chancellor Charles Reed said the proposed fees weren't intended to raise revenue. Rather, they were supposed to encourage students to complete their degrees and move on, making way for other students.

That's a legitimate concern, and CSU officials should consider alternatives to raising fees in pursuit of their goal.

Brown urged UC regents to look at expanding online offering to make room for more students. That also may be an option at CSU. The trustees also should look at how California's community colleges addressed concerns that students who put off graduation make it harder for others to complete their required courses.

Under the new community college policy, students who have completed their graduation requirements drop to the bottom of the priority list if they enroll in additional classes. CSU's fee-based approach may have weeded out those "super-seniors" who couldn't afford to pay out-of-state tuition rates for additional classes, but affluent students still could have blocked the path of classmates trying to graduate.

© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View