With growth limits eyed for revision, Healdsburg housing debate heats up
As the father of Healdsburg’s growth management ordinance, Jim Winston is understandably nervous with the tinkering underway to ease the restriction on the maximum number of new housing units that can be built every year in town.
In Healdsburg, one of the priciest housing markets in Sonoma County, city leaders are trying to find ways to create more affordable homes. But they see the ordinance, which limits the number of new dwellings to an average of 30 per year, as an impediment in need of revising if the city wants to make inroads on the housing problem.
Winston, who wrote the ballot initiative approved by voters 15 years ago, worries the measure could be gutted, leading to “an explosion of growth” in the town of almost 12,000 population.
And if the proposed revisions - likely to be presented for voter approval in 2016 - go too far, he vows to fight it.
“On a personal level I feel as if this (growth maintenance ordinance) is my child and I’m going to do whatever it takes to protect it,” said Winston, a retired businessman who heads up Healdsburg Citizens for Responsible Growth.
The growth measure was approved by voters in 2000, in response to concern over larger housing projects like Parkland Farms built on the city’s periphery.
Facing housing shortage
But City Councilman Eric Ziedrich said the ordinance has created a significant shortage of housing, contributed to the escalation of real estate prices, and turned Healdsburg into “a playground for the entitled rich.”
Because of the low number of new dwellings allowed each year, he said it produces mostly expensive single-family homes, making it almost impossible to build multifamily, higher-density projects and the so-called workforce housing that everyone seems to agree is so badly needed.
“The door is shut before it’s ever opened. For the 40, 60, 80 units, the door is closed before we can ever discuss it,” he said.
Winston believes the ordinance is being unfairly blamed for the paucity of economical housing in Healdsburg, pointing to figures that show the city has never hit the growth limit since it was imposed. He also contends that larger apartment complexes are out of scale for Healdsburg and that smaller ones could be scattered around town.
The Healdsburg City Council established the housing committee that Ziedrich leads after a clamor over recent high-profile evictions and steep rent increases - including those for 21 Latino families in a low-income apartment complex where the new owner is fixing the dilapidated property and in some cases planned to more than double the rent.
The evictions, which led to packed City Council meetings this summer with residents demanding action, highlighted the dearth of available affordable housing in Healdsburg. Vacancy rates in the rental market are “extremely low or nonexistent,” according to a 2014 city housing study.
And housing prices in the Healdsburg market - including outside city limits - were the highest in Sonoma County for the first half of 2015.
Home prices jumped 31 percent to a median $899,000 for the first six months of this year, compared to last year, according to The Press Democrat’s housing report, which is compiled by Pacific Union International Vice President Rick Laws.
Amplified issue for city
Richard Butler, a food service manager who was appointed to the housing committee, said Healdsburg is in danger of losing its heart and soul, and its diversity, if working, middle-class folks can’t afford a home there.
He and his wife, Adrianne, a massage therapist, and their two boys, ages 6 and 9, have lived in a two-bedroom rental for several years. They would like to buy a house someday in Healdsburg, but feel priced out of the market.
“We are part of the face of what is the big challenge in Healdsburg,” Butler said.
“It’s not just Healdsburg. It’s everywhere,” he said of the affordability crunch. “It’s amplified in Healdsburg because this is such a desirable place to live and there are so few places.”
City officials and consultants have been focusing for a couple of years on the need to amend the growth management ordinance, especially to achieve more workforce housing - defined as affordable to those who provide vital services in the community, such as teachers, firefighters, police officers and restaurant and hotel workers.
Ziedrich said the tight growth cap has led to “an overabundance of only those seniors or retirees that can afford to live in a very affluent enclave.”
Consultant Jim Heid, who facilitates the housing committee meetings, said the current growth ordinance doesn’t differentiate between an allocation for a 400-square-foot studio and a 5,000-square-foot mansion.
UPDATED: Please read and follow our commenting policy: