s
s
Sections
Sections
Subscribe
You've read 5 of 15 free articles this month.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read 10 of 15 free articles this month.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read all of your free articles this month.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
We've got a special deal for readers like you.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting 99 cents per month and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?
Thanks for reading! Why not subscribe?
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting 99 cents per month and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?
Want to keep reading? Subscribe today!
Ooops! You're out of free articles. Starting at just 99 cents per month, you can keep reading all of our products and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?

<b>A witch hunt</b>

EDITOR: Thank you for Friday's editorial highlighting the Gary Wysocky report ("There in black and white — but mostly black"). The hypocrisy of Santa Rosa Councilman Jake Ours' comment — "Everyone needs to know what's going on here, not just little bits of it" — is incredible in light of the fact that the report was so heavily redacted.

Since the City Council wanted to publish the report, it should have been published in its entirety. This whole affair has been a tempest in a teapot. It should have been resolved quietly, in house, behind closed doors and without the expenditure of tax dollars.

I agree with Councilwoman Julie Combs that this was a witch hunt. Certain council members saw this as an excuse to go after Wysocky. It doesn't pass the smell test. I hate injustice wherever it occurs.

RITA NICHOLAS

Santa Rosa

<b>Child labor</b>

EDITOR: It is inhumane that we have children working on tobacco farms, some as young as 7 who are getting sick from absorbing tobacco through their skin. Working long hours harvesting nicotine- and pesticide-laced tobacco leaves, children aren't being protected.

According to a Human Rights Watch report, U.S. agriculture labor laws allow children to work longer hours at younger ages and in more hazardous conditions in the tobacco industry than in any other industry. This is the U.S.in 2014? Nearly three-quarters of the children interviewed reported vomiting, nausea and headaches while working on tobacco farms. These symptoms are consistent with nicotine poisoning.

Paul Hornback, a Republican Kentucky state senator, said, "People get pretty extreme trying to protect everybody from everything. It hard manual labor, but there's nothing wrong with hard manual labor." Never mind that these are children.

This was covered in the business section of The Press Democrat ("Report highlights child labor on tobacco farms," May 15), but it should have been front-page news. People other than those interested in business should be more aware of this.

All of our children need our support to end this type of exploitation. It is hard to believe this is not 1914.

ELAINE LIEBER

Sonoma

<b>Mayor on Measure G</b>

EDITOR: I would like to correct a statement in my recent Close to Home column ("Measure G will keep Cotati viable," Sunday) in which I wrote that the Sonoma County Taxpayers' Association decided not to oppose Measure G in Cotati after hearing about financial cuts made in recent years and our adoption of a two-tiered pension plan. I have since spoken with representatives of taxpayers' association and wish to correct any misunderstanding I may have created. The association has, in fact, taken no position on Measure G but for reasons of its own having nothing to do with our financial cuts or adoption of a two-tiered plan. I want to be transparent about this and apologize for the misunderstanding.

JOHN DELL'OSSO

Mayor, Cotati

<b>A second chance</b>

EDITOR: This letter is not a defense of Supervisor Efren Carrillo. In fact, even Carrillo has made it clear that he is not defending his actions from July 13. But in the onslaught of negative public reaction to his recent acquittal, very few have spoken up to say enough of the piling on. We have found those few letters from folks such as Carol Mills ("West county's rep," May 7) and Dan Hamburg ("Let Carrillo do his job," May 13) to be thoughtful and welcome in the midst of such outrage. While it is not quite a lynch mob mentality, there is a faint whiff of a holier-than-thou strain running through it.

We are long-time activists who approach change in a different way than someone trying to create change from within the system. In our interactions with Carrillo as our supervisor, we found him diligent in preparation and responsive to differing perspectives. We know that addiction to power breeds arrogance. Carrillo is guilty of that and has learned from his bad judgments. We would like to see him remain in office as our supervisor as he grows stronger and works on making amends to the woman he offended as well as to the rest of us.

DIAN HARDY

Sebastopol

and MARY MOORE

Camp Meeker

<b>Measure B for schools</b>

EDITOR: I voted for Measure B on my absentee ballot. I have lived in Rohnert Park for nearly 40 years and have taught at Rancho Cotate High School most of that time. I support improving the infrastructure for all of the schools in Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District.

If you don't think that these schools need structural improvement, visit any one of them. Surfaces are uneven. Buildings need painting. Classrooms need upgrading.

If you believe these funds will be mismanaged, get involved. Become a part of the oversight committee. Speak up at school board meetings, or write the board members and tell them you want these schools fixed.

I grew up in the golden era when California schools were fully funded and citizens totally supported education. Some of my peers, senior citizens, have forgotten the wonderful schools and teachers we had. We must give back. Measure B is an opportunity for voters to say that we want the best schools.

Instead of thinking of reasons why this measure shouldn't pass, think of how an aging school district can be improved. If a person bought a home 40 years ago, he or she would continue to make home improvements. Vote for Measure B so that school improvement can be ongoing.

LANNY LOWERY

Rohnert Park