We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, nearly 1.5 million people used their mobile devices to visit our sites.
Already a subscriber?
Wow! You read a lot!
Reading enhances confidence, empathy, decision-making, and overall life satisfaction. Keep it up! Subscribe.
Already a subscriber?
Oops, you're out of free articles.
Until next month, you can always look over someone's shoulder at the coffee shop.
Already a subscriber?
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, we posted 390 stories about the fire. And they were shared nearly 137,000 times.
Already a subscriber?
Supporting the community that supports us.
Obviously you value quality local journalism. Thank you.
Already a subscriber?
Oops, you're out of free articles.
We miss you already! (Subscriptions start at just 99 cents.)
Already a subscriber?

Advocates for the disabled on Thursday urged the state Department of Justice to take over the investigation and prosecution of a former Sonoma Developmental Center employee who is alleged to have used a stun gun on 11 patients.

In a letter to Attorney General Kamala Harris, Greg deGiere, a spokesman for The Arc and United Cerebral Palsy, accused local authorities of failing to conduct a thorough investigation into claims that caregiver Archie Millora, 38, used the weapon on patients last fall.

DeGiere said the Sonoma County Sheriff's Office and the institution's own police force, the Office of Protective Services, were slow to respond, while prosecutors allowed Millora to plead to a misdemeanor weapons charge carrying a penalty "that would make a slap on the wrist look harsh."

Afterward, the Sheriff's Office and Office of Protective Services pointed fingers at each other, he said. And the District Attorney's Office promised to revisit the case only after it was reported by the media, he said.

"The bottom line is, this is a case of serial torture and no one has been arrested on these charges," DeGiere said in a phone interview Thursday. "We're asking the attorney general to take over."

Sheriff Steve Freitas said the Office of Protective Services informed his detectives they had a suspect but declined any help from the Sheriff's Office.

"They never asked us for any investigative help. If they did we would have given it to them," Freitas said. "We generally don't go in and force our investigative unit on other law enforcement agencies."

Spencer Brady, chief deputy district attorney, said only that his office was "continuing to review the case both from a legal and factual standpoint."

"The door here is open to additional information and further review," Brady said.

The institution received the allegations about Millora on Sept. 26 from an anonymous tipster, according to a report by California Watch, part of the Berkeley-based Center for Investigative Reporting.

The caller accused Millora, who was later fired, of using a stun gun on men in a unit for the severely disabled.

Doctors confirmed the injuries and officers found a stun gun in Millora's car, but he wasn't immediately charged or arrested.

Instead, the case was handled as an administrative matter.

The Office of Protective Services delayed interviewing witnesses, including Millora, and downplayed the seriousness of the case, California Watch reported.

For instance, the state agency didn't immediately tell the Sheriff's Office it had confirmed cases of abuse. The sheriff has jurisdiction over Sonoma Developmental Center.

The director of the state Department of Developmental Services said the Sheriff's Office decided not to take over. But Freitas said the Office of Protective Services never asked for help.

"The thing we got from them from Day One is they had this case," Freitas said. "They had a suspect and didn't need our help."

In the end, prosecutors reviewed reports from internal police, which determined the stun gun found in Millora's car wasn't used on the patients.

Millora wasn't charged with assault. He instead pleaded no contest to having a loaded Glock pistol in his car. He received home confinement and probation.

DeGiere expressed concern that Millora may be free to take other jobs that put him in contact with disabled people.

Road Repair Projects

Ferguson Road Mile Marker 10–11.31 (Pavement chip seal)

Furlong Road Mile Marker 10-11.73 (Pavement chip seal)

Poplar Avenue Mile Marker 10-11 (Pavement chip seal)

Bohemian Highway Mile Marker 13.93–18.78 (Pavement overlay)

Grove Street Mile Marker 11.79–13.87 (Pavement overlay)

River Road Mile Marker 30.00-34.21 (Pavement overlay)

Willowside Road Mile Marker 10.16-11.17 (Pavement repair)

Wallace Road Mile Marker 10-11.49 (Pavement repair)

River Road Mile Marker 30-34.24 (Ditching)

Los Alamos Road Mile Marker 10.94-14.30 (Ditching)

Bohemian Highway Mile Marker 10-13.60 (Ditching)

Ross Road Mile Marker 10.61-11.86 (Ditching)

Neeley Road Mile Marker 14.92 (Viaduct replacement)

Summerhome Park Road Mile Marker 10.41 (Viaduct replacement)

Porter Creek Road Mile Marker 19.89–20.19 (Pavement grind and patch)

River Road Mile Marker 12.14–12.54 (Pavement grind and patch)

Tomales Road Mile Marker 10-10.30 (Pavement grind and patch)

Arnold Drive Mile Marker 13.30-13.60 (Pavement grind and patch)

Mountain Road Mile Marker 10.54 (Culvert replacement)

Coleman Valley Road Mile Marker 17.57 (Culvert replacement)

Salmon Creek Road Mile Marker 12.29 (Culvert replacement)

Chiquita Road Mile Marker 11.69 (Culvert replacement)

Bonness Road Mile Marker 10.13 (Culvert replacement)

Bonness Road Mile Marker 10.42 (Culvert replacement)

Lytton Station Road Mile Marker 11.14 (Culvert replacement)

Lytton Station Road Mile Marker 11.16 (Culvert replacement)

West Dry Creek Road Mile Marker 14.96 (Culvert replacement)

West Dry Creek Road Mile Marker 10.45 (Culvert replacement)

Windsor Road Mile Marker 11.99 (Culvert replacement)

Windsor Road Mile Marker 12.21 (Culvert replacement)

Irwin Lane Mile Marker 11.19 (Culvert replacement)

Show Comment