In this courtroom sketch, suspect James Holmes, third from right, sits in district court Monday, July 30, 2012, in Centennial, Colo., during his arraignment where he was formally charged with 24 counts of murder and 116 counts of attempted murder in the shooting rampage at an Aurora movie theater, on July 20. From left are: District Judge William Blair Sylvester; suspect James Holmes; and defense attorneys Daniel King and Tamara Brady. (AP Photo/Jeff Kandyba, Pool)

Lawyers: Colorado shooting suspect is mentally ill

CENTENNIAL, Colo. — Attorneys for the suspect in the Colorado movie theater shootings said Thursday their client is mentally ill and that they need more time to assess the nature of his illness.

James Holmes' lawyers made the disclosure at a court hearing in suburban Denver where news media organizations asked a judge to unseal court documents in the case.

Holmes, a 24-year-old former Ph.D. student at the University of Colorado, Denver, had the familiar, dazed demeanor that he had in previous court appearances.

Holmes is accused of going on a July 20 shooting rampage at a midnight showing of the latest Batman movie in Aurora, killing 12 people and injuring 58 others.

Defense attorney Daniel King made the revelation about Holmes' illness as he argued that the defense needs more information from prosecutors and investigators to assess their client.

"We cannot begin to assess the nature and the depth of Mr. Holmes' mental illness until we receive full disclosure," he said.

King said Holmes sought out university psychiatrist Lynne Fenton for help. A hearing was scheduled for Aug. 16 to establish whether there was a doctor-patient relationship between them.

There were fewer victims and family members in the courtroom Thursday than at earlier hearings. Several spectators appeared mesmerized by the sight of Holmes, unable to take their eyes off him.

Mental illness "doesn't give him the right to do what he did," Chris Townsond, who escaped the shooting unharmed, said after the hearing. "I don't care how mentally damaged he is."

The Associated Press and 20 other news organizations asked Chief District Judge William Sylvester to scale back a gag order that bars the university from releasing details about Holmes.

Sylvester had said in issuing the order that he wanted to protect the county's investigation. But even Aurora officials have cited the gag order in declining to speak about the city's response to the shootings.

Steven D. Zansberg, an attorney representing the news consortium, noted that state law allows judges to issue gag orders barring prosecutors and law enforcement from commenting.

King opposed the news media motion, saying the gag order ensures fairness. Prosecutor Karen Pearson said she had filed her own argument on the issue in court — and that it is sealed.

Sylvester said he would rule on the matter by Monday. He did not say when he would respond to the news media's request to unseal the court documents.

Those documents include the case file, which makes it impossible for observers to understand prosecution and defense arguments on motions that are referenced by number only.

The documents, which also include search warrants, inventories of evidence and police interviews with witnesses, can be an important source of information for the public.

Little is known about how police say Holmes prepared for the shooting, or how they say he rigged his apartment with explosives.

Gregory Moore, editor of The Denver Post, said before the hearing that the news organizations are trying to perform their watchdog role, making sure the investigation is being conducted openly and fairly.

In Colorado, this type of legal battle has been seen before, including the 2003 case of Los Angeles Lakers player Kobe Bryant who faced sexual assault charges in Vail.

It took a news media challenge to unseal an affidavit in which police laid out their case for an arrest. Bryant maintained his innocence, and prosecutors dropped the case in 2005.

UPDATED: Please read and follow our commenting policy:
  • This is a family newspaper, please use a kind and respectful tone.
  • No profanity, hate speech or personal attacks. No off-topic remarks.
  • No disinformation about current events.
  • We will remove any comments — or commenters — that do not follow this commenting policy.