PG&E: Toxic tank in Santa Rosa best left alone
A huge underground tank full of toxic black sludge in downtown Santa Rosa should be left where it lies because it is too difficult to safely remove and poses little threat to neighboring Santa Rosa Creek, according to the Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
The utility has also concluded that the contamination on the site of its former manufactured gas plant is immobile enough that it does not need to install a costly barrier designed to prevent waste material from migrating toward the creek, arguing it would be too disruptive and unnecessary.
The hands-off approach outlined for the Santa Rosa City Council last week represents a departure from the aggressive cleanup efforts that PG&E has undertaken on the property in recent years, which have resulted in the removal of tons of similar material.
But PG&E’s environmental consultants say the new strategy is justified because years of water-quality monitoring data shows that neither groundwater in the area nor the creek are at risk of contamination.
“The stuff is immobile. It hasn’t gone anywhere over the past 100 years and we have over 25 years of data,” Max Reyhani, principal engineer with Terra Pacific Group, told the council. “I think that’s a pretty good indication of the stability of site conditions.”
PG&E’s latest plan still needs the approval of the North Coast Water Quality Control Board, which has been overseeing cleanup of the property for nearly 30 years. The City Council, which has no direct authority over the cleanup of the site, has requested regular status reports on the downtown project.
Water board staff expressed confidence that continuing to monitor groundwater in the area made more sense than requiring the removal of the tank and material at this point.
“With the monitoring, I am extremely confident that we’re not going to have an issue that actually manages to migrate to the creek (over the next decade),” said Craig Hunt, supervisor of the water board’s cleanup division.
But not everyone is so sanguine about the situation.
Allen Hatheway, author of a 2012 textbook on the subject of cleaning up former gas plant sites, called the claims that the tank can’t be removed “nonsense.”
In an interview, the retired Missouri University of Science and Technology professor of geological engineering and author of the 1,400-page book, “Remediation of Former Manufactured Gas Plants and Other Coal-Tar Sites,” said the claim that it is safer to leave such potent contaminants in the ground is “a standard utility industry argument” used to avoid costly cleanup efforts.
While there are challenges to performing such work in downtown environments, remediation companies are more than capable of completing such work, Hatheway said.
“It can be done and it’ll be a lot more straightforward than the City Council has been led to believe,” said Hatheway, who said he reviewed council materials and watched a tape of the meeting. He is not involved in the cleanup effort and has not studied PG&E’s plans in detail.
“Is it appropriate to just walk away and leave that?” he asked.
Remnants of past
The industrial history of the 1.5-acre site on the northern bank of Santa Rosa Creek at First and B streets stretches back to 1876 when the Santa Rosa Gas Light Co. began producing and distributing gas to light city streets and heat cooking stoves. Unlike the natural gas used today, gas in the 1800s and early 1900s was manufactured locally from coal or heavy oil. The process left behind wastes that were frequently disposed of on or near the property.
Coal tar contains polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, a family of chemicals that includes known cancer-causing agents. The steel tank in question is 50 feet long, 6 feet wide and filled with coal tar that is the consistency of taffy and has a high concentration of naphthalene, Reyhani said.
PG&E purchased the plant in 1908, closed it in 1924 and used it for several decades as a distribution facility. Then in 1987, it sold the site to a private development partnership, 137 Santa Rosa Group, which agreed to clean it up before constructing an office building on the property.
Regulators warned the developers, including Hal Musco, the owner of a petroleum services company, of the need to fully clean the property up. Local fire officials granted a permit allowing the tank, which was located near a high-pressure gas main, to be left in the ground, but only after being emptied and filled with an inert material.
That never happened, and a parking lot was built over the site in 1989. Decades of legal wrangling between the water board, developers and PG&E followed. The water board got serious in 2004, after the construction of the Prince Memorial Greenway uncovered contamination along the northern bank of the creek at the site. The board issued fines and, in 2006, PG&E took the lead in the cleanup.
UPDATED: Please read and follow our commenting policy: