Excited reactions in Sonoma County to gay marriage ruling
The news that marriage equality is the law of the land crackled out from the car radio Friday morning to the ears of 84-year-old Keith Kerr of Santa Rosa, a retired Army brigadier general who broke a 30-year silence to declare he is gay and to speak out against discrimination.
North Coast activists who have spent decades championing gay rights met Friday’s U.S. Supreme Court declaration that the Constitution guarantees a nationwide right to same-sex marriage with relief and elation and quickly began planning celebrations.
Kerr, who more than a decade ago joined other top-ranking military officers in declaring they were gay and spoke out against the Pentagon’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, said Friday’s decision was a profound step forward for civil rights.
“It’s a tremendous victory for LGBT people,” Kerr said, talking by phone while on the road to Sebastopol for a bonsai workshop after the decision was announced.
The ruling does not affect California laws, but it has paved the way for more than two dozen states to join the rest of the country in allowing same-sex couples to marry. The right to marry was restored for gay Californians in 2013, when the U.S. Supreme Court declared that a 2008 state law restricting marriage to straight couples - Proposition 8 - was unconstitutional.
Kerr said that while the ruling does not affect his rights in California, he is thinking about his friends in Virginia, New York City and the Midwest.
“This will make a tremendous difference for them,” he said.
At home in Glen Ellen, Joshua Rymer called out - “Yahoo!” - to his husband, Timothy Frazer, and the couple kissed. Rymer and Frazer were plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging a ban on same-sex marriage that voters approved in 2000, Proposition 22, but which was struck down in 2008 by the state Supreme Court.
“This has been a long process. … It started long ago with people in the 1950s and 1960s who were brave enough to come out, and (it continued with) all the movements that followed,” Rymer said.
He reflected on being a 13-year-old boy when his older brother came out as gay and how that gave him courage when he addressed his own sexuality. Years later, when Rymer and his husband joined the legal fight against Proposition 22, he was moved and surprised by how much support he received.
“It certainly felt wonderful to play a role and to contribute,” Rymer said.
In Santa Rosa, 14-year-old Daniel Martinez-Leffew reflected on how much he’s focused the past six years of his young life championing for his fathers and other couples like them to have the right to marry. His parents married in 2008.
The teen wrote letters, attended rallies and made a four-minute video in 2013 urging Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to strike down California’s Proposition 8 same-sex marriage ban and the federal Defense of Marriage Act. The video went viral on YouTube and put the teen in the national media spotlight.
On Friday morning, he was seated around the breakfast table with his fathers, Jay and Bryan Leffew, huddled around a laptop computer, absorbing the news.
“When my dad told me, I was like … ‘What?’?” Leffew said. “It felt like a burden was lifted, like we finally finished.”
Sonoma County voters have rejected two same-sex marriage bans that were approved statewide in 2000 and again in 2008, Propositions 22 and 8.
But beyond the popular opinion, not all North Coast residents were buoyed by the high court’s decision.
Santa Rosa Bishop Robert Vasa has been an outspoken opponent of same-sex marriage, as well as other social issues such as access to abortion, since he took the helm in 2011 of the sprawling Santa Rosa Diocese that stretches from Sonoma County to the Oregon border with an estimated 165,000 registered members, including about 45,000 regular church attendees. On Friday, Vasa stated in a bulleted list that the court made “an egregious error in moral judgment.”
The bishop compared Friday’s decision to the 1857 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford that black people were not U.S. citizens, and Vasa stated that “similarly, today’s justices have erred.”
“Just as Roe v. Wade did not settle the abortion question nearly two generations ago, Obergefell v. Hodges does not settle the marriage question today,” he said in his written remarks.
Religious freedom became the banner under which the governor of Indiana in April signed a law that would have made it possible for individuals and businesses to discriminate against customers for religious reasons. However, public backlash prompted lawmakers to backpedal, and Republican legislative leaders said they would change the law to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.
UPDATED: Please read and follow our commenting policy: