s
s
Sections
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, nearly 1.5 million people used their mobile devices to visit our sites.
Already a subscriber?
Wow! You read a lot!
Reading enhances confidence, empathy, decision-making, and overall life satisfaction. Keep it up! Subscribe.
Already a subscriber?
Oops, you're out of free articles.
Until next month, you can always look over someone's shoulder at the coffee shop.
Already a subscriber?
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, we posted 390 stories about the fire. And they were shared nearly 137,000 times.
Already a subscriber?
Supporting the community that supports us.
Obviously you value quality local journalism. Thank you.
Already a subscriber?
Oops, you're out of free articles.
We miss you already! (Subscriptions start at just 99 cents.)
Already a subscriber?

Though Sonoma County is set to receive millions of dollars in newly approved state funding to help repair its ailing road network, most of the money won’t come fast enough to fill a projected $3.7 million budget shortfall in a key area of the county’s transportation department.

The expected funding gap in the road operations division stems from a yearslong decline in state gas tax revenues, compounded by rising operational costs and exacerbated further by a separate bill for damage from this year’s severe winter storms, officials said.

A massive transportation funding package that passed the state Legislature in April, SB 1, will help, delivering some $3.8 million in new revenue next fiscal year. In future years, once the legislation’s provisions take full effect, the county expects to receive more than three times that amount annually.

County officials want to use half the new state money next fiscal year to fill the budget hole in the roads operations division, which includes workers who trim trees, fill potholes, repair culverts and maintain bridges, as well as administrative employees who design infrastructure projects, pay bills and answer phones, among other duties.

The transportation department wants to spend the other half of the new state money next year on more visible, one-time paving projects called for by motorists and other road users. The county has already allocated some $65 million in discretionary funds toward improving its roads over the past five years.

The idea is to make sure drivers — who will be taxed more at the pump because of the state legislation — see results, even if that means county officials need to find creative ways of filling the rest of the road operations gap.

“The people that are paying these increased fees, they want to see paving on the road,” said Susan Klassen, the county’s Transportation and Public Works director. “If all the money just disappeared to road operations — yeah, that would be one option ... but then the taxpayers that are paying for the gas tax and the increased fees and stuff are not going to see the benefit, really. It’s invisible to them.”

If the transportation department were to absorb the entire $3.7 million shortfall, it would look to eliminate 28 jobs, including 18 road maintenance workers and 10 administrative employees. But many of those positions are vacant, so Klassen said only five current staffers face potential layoffs. And because she anticipates using the state funding to cover more than half of the road operations shortfall, she hopes to be able to avoid layoffs entirely.

In addition to using $1.9 million of funding from SB 1, the transportation department has outlined a plan to use a total of $600,000 from other county sources, leaving a remaining road operations gap of $1.2 million, according to plans presented Tuesday to the Board of Supervisors.

In future years, the department expects SB 1 will provide enough funds for it to avoid road operations shortfalls.

“What we have is essentially less of a budget issue and more of a cash-flow issue, in my opinion, because of the way SB 1 will come in and provide those funds over the next several years,” said Supervisor David Rabbitt, who sits on multiple regional transportation boards. “It could be that we dip into reserves and be able to pay those back when the gas tax money increases going forward.”

Craig Harrison, co-founder of Save Our Sonoma Roads, said that in addition to reserves, supervisors should pull from revenue derived from hotel bed taxes, which voters overwhelmingly agreed to increase in November with the passage of Measure L.

“We know the department of Transportation and Public Works is doing the best they can under a very difficult situation,” Harrison said. “We hope the supervisors can find some creative ways to give them enough money to do as much as we possibly can to get back on track.”

Making the problem more pressing, the transportation department also faces a $4.1 million unfunded liability related to storm damage caused by the heavy rains that swelled the Russian River, flooded numerous homes and exacted a huge toll on county infrastructure. Federal funds should cover $14.5 million of the total costs for storm damage.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency is expected to reimburse the county for the cost of initial storm cleanup and some major, specific repairs that were necessary after that, Klassen said.

“What they don’t pay for are things like the potholes — the fact that a lot of our roads were in fairly bad shape going into the storm, and the thousand potholes we had turned into 3,000 potholes and we’re still out there filling,” Klassen said.

Supervisors will take action on the transportation department’s funding for next fiscal year sometime after budget hearings begin June 12.

You can reach Staff Writer J.D. Morris at 707-521-5337 or jd.morris@pressdemocrat.com.