s
s
Sections
Sections
Subscribe
You've read 5 of 15 free articles this month.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read 10 of 15 free articles this month.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read all of your free articles this month.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
We've got a special deal for readers like you.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting 99 cents per month and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?
Thanks for reading! Why not subscribe?
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting 99 cents per month and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?
Want to keep reading? Subscribe today!
Ooops! You're out of free articles. Starting at just 99 cents per month, you can keep reading all of our products and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?

The Santa Rosa City Council last week made one of those decisions that affirms a community's belief in its own future. In approving a project that provides housing and support services for disadvantaged young people, the council chose determination and compassion over pessimism and dread.

There were witnesses. A standing-room-only crowd that included some of the county's most prosperous and influential people sat (and stood) through a long public hearing for one reason only: They wanted to do the right thing. They wanted to stand up and say it's not OK that 1,200 kids are sleeping in alley ways and under bridges.

If their example becomes a model for the future, well, good for us.

This began as a neighborhood controversy like many others before it. A local nonprofit, Social Advocates for Youth, wanted to transform the former Warrack Hospital into emergency and transitional housing and support services for young people 18 to 24 who are homeless or aging out of foster care. It would be called the Dream Center.

Some neighbors didn't like the idea.

The proposal won unanimous approval from the city Planning Commission in January, a decision that was appealed to the City Council. On Tuesday night, the City Council upheld the Planning Commission, and the vote once again was unanimous.

Only a handful of opponents showed up to speak at the public hearing. They said they feared the people brought to their neighborhood by the Dream Center. They wanted more studies, and they promised a lawsuit if the council approved the project.

In an unusual turn for a neighborhood controversy, more neighbors testified in favor of the project than spoke against it. SAY worked hard to mobilize its supporters, many wearing bright yellow T-shirts that read: "Say YES to dreams."

Among the dozens of people speaking in support of the center were prominent business, nonprofit, church, government and civic leaders, including Connie Codding of Codding Enterprises, Bill Friedman of the Friedman's Home Improvement stores, Steve Page of Sonoma Raceway, Willie Tamayo of La Tortilla Factory, Vic Trione of Luther Burbank Savings, former police chief Tom Schwedhelm, judges Gayle Guynup and Arnold Rosenfield and former mayor Jim Pedgrift.

In the world of local government, this is what a full-court press looks like.

In retrospect, opponents may have erred when they questioned SAY's credibility. Having enjoyed widespread community support for more than four decades, this is an organization with friends.

Many speakers used their time to testify on behalf of SAY's credentials as a organization that keeps its promises.

They also praised SAY's year-long effort to respond to neighborhood concerns — reducing the number of housing units to 63 and agreeing to conditions to limit noise and require background checks for tenants.

"What I see is an applicant that has tried really hard to reach out to the community," Mayor Scott Bartley would later say.

The opponents were left with what isn't the most persuasive of arguments: Let's keep kids homeless so this abandoned hospital can remain abandoned.

For SAY, this gift from Sutter Health remains a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. There's no way a nonprofit could afford to purchase and re-purpose the former hospital at market prices. (The hospital at the intersection of Hoen Avenue and Summerfield Road was mothballed in 2008, a victim of the changing economics and the changing technology of health care.)

No one questioned the need for the Dream Center. In Sonoma County, about a third of the homeless population today is under 25 years old. They are surviving from day to day without the support needed to find shelter and a job, and escape hardships that can lead to desperation and failure.

When the public hearing was closed and the discussion began, members of the City Council seemed happy to be on the same page for once.

Councilman Jake Ours was celebrating this happy turn of events: "I'm having a good time tonight. ... Our children are our most precious asset, and we don't alway do enough for them."

Councilman Gary Wysocky recalled his time coaching kids from hardscrabble backgrounds: "These kids never stop trying. All they want is a shot ... If we don't help our kids, what are we as a civilization and a society?"

Councilman Ernesto Olivares praised the outpouring of support for SAY and endorsed the project, while reminding his audience, "We do get to celebrate now and then, but there is still work to do."

Yes, there is still work to do. But we learned last week that good things happen when a community and its elected representatives speak up for people in need.

Pete Golis is a columnist for The Press Democrat. Email him at golispd@gmail.com.